Lateo.net - Flux RSS en pagaille (pour en ajouter : @ moi)

🔒
❌ À propos de FreshRSS
Il y a de nouveaux articles disponibles, cliquez pour rafraîchir la page.
Hier — 27 mars 2024Lifehacker

What People Are Getting Wrong This Week: Political Half-Truths

It’s an election year, so naturally there are virtual firehoses of misinformation pointed at potential voters. While there are encouraging signs that people are getting better at spotting misinformation, there’s a kind of “fake news” that seems particularly pernicious on both sides of the political aisle: drawing a conclusion based on omitted information or missing context. It’s a favorite tactic of politicians that explodes during an election year, so let’s dig into a couple of widely spread examples—one from the right and one from the left.

Gas Price Meme
Credit: Snopes

The picture above, from Snopes, who culled it from my aunt's Facebook page, is not Photoshopped and it's not a lie. The national average price of a gallon of gas really did dip to $1.77 in April of 2020. But the meme text suggests that this had somehow had to do with decisions Donald Trump made while in office.

The answer is always "supply and demand"

People like to discuss the reasons gas prices fluctuate, probably because we are confronted with it every time we go to the pumps, but whether you blame high gas prices on corporate greed, or credit low gas prices to Donald Trump being awesome, you're equally wrong. The main driver of gas prices is basic supply and demand. The real reason gas was so cheap in 2021 was a global drop in demand for petroleum caused by economic activity due to COVID-19 lockdown. It would not have mattered who was president; it's not like there's a lever in the Oval Office that sets commodity prices.

This isn’t to say that governmental policy has no effect on prices. The inflation spike of 2022 was caused in part by the $2 trillion American Rescue Plan signed in 2021. It’s complex and there are a lot of other factors at work, but as a general rule, supplying more money to the economy to prevent or reverse a recession results in inflation, but i it also causes the economy to grow and stay out of recession (a much worse result than higher inflation.) Again, it's supply and demand.

Politicians on both sides lie

It’s not just right-wing people who fall victim to the allure of jumping to conclusion fallacy though, though. Check out this chart posted on Twitter by Kamala Harris:

Biden job growth chart
Credit: Kamala Harris - Twitter/X

Like the right-wing meme, this chart isn't inaccurate or Photoshopped, but it leaves off the same thing the gas price photo omits: COVID. Most of the jobs “created” during the Biden administration were the result of people returning to work following lay-offs during the pandemic. Adjusted for COVID, the net job-gain from Biden’s first day until February 2024 was 5.5 million jobs. Nice work, but a lot less sexy-looking on a chart. 

During his State of the Union address, Biden said, "The only president other than Donald Trump that lost jobs during an administration was Herbert Hoover," which is half-true (maybe), but only if you ignore the economic devastation that COVID wrought, and also ignore that we don't really know the number of jobs lost during Hoover's administration—the Bureau of Labor Statistics didn't exist until after Hoover was out of office.

How the same numbers tell a different story

While Biden put an overly positive spin on his job numbers and bagged on Trump's, it’s possible to look at the same basic information and draw the opposite conclusion. At a speech on August 5th, Donald Trump said: “During Biden’s first 30 months in office, just 2.1 million new jobs were created, and by contrast, during my first 30 months in office we created 4.9 million new jobs.”

According to the Bureau of Labor Statistics, when Trump took office, there were 145.6 million non-farm jobs in the U.S. Thirty months later, there were 150.8 million (in a first, Trump gave himself slightly less credit than he deserved during this speech). When Biden took office, there were 143 million nonfarm jobs. By his 30th month in office, the number of nonfarm jobs had risen to 156.2 million. 

Trump isn't totally lying (this time)—he's trying to eat his cake and have it too. He gives Biden no credit for jobs that returned after the coronavirus pandemic, and assigns himself no blame for jobs that were lost due to COVID, limiting his assessment to the 30-month window of the Trump administration before COVID shook up the economy. As Dean Baker, co-founder of the Center for Economic and Policy Research told Politifact, Trump is saying "everything that was bad is Biden's fault, whereas everything that is good would have happened anyhow.”

Spinning numbers to make yourself look better is nothing new, but what if you really want to know the truth? You probably can't.

Which administration has the stronger economy?

Despite polls showing Trump with an 11- to 20-point lead over Biden on the question of which candidate would better handle the economy, the economy did well under Trump, if you don’t take the shocks of COVID into account, and the economy is doing well under Biden, if you don’t assign blame for the COVID shock on Biden. (It also depends on what you mean by the economy "doing well.")

Even if you wanted to base your vote solely on which administration would be “best for the economy,” (instead of, say, which candidate is being tried for nearly 100 felonies) it’s probably not possible, even though we have recent data on how each handled it. The effects of public policy on the economy is such a complex subject, and there are so many people pushing so many agendas—weirdos sharing gas price memes on Facebook, vice presidents sharing slanted job charts on twitter—that it’s probably not possible to understand with any degree of certainty. Even if you devote your life to studying macroeconomics, other economists will have diametrically opposed views to yours.

This leaves us with tribalism and vibes, two factors that have probably always decided U.S. elections. If you're thinking "that's true of most politicians, but not my favorite one! They're a straight-shooter!" the wool has been pulled over your eyes. A political candidate who was really honest, who refused to engage in deception and self-puffery, would be dead in the water in any election larger than the local school board. Imagine a presidential candidate running on a platform of "There's not much I can do about the economy; it's supply and demand."

À partir d’avant-hierLifehacker

The Out-of-Touch Adults' Guide to Kid Culture: Dogs Vs. Lemons

This week's youth culture report is all about conflict: Dogs are fighting lemons, Gen-Z is fighting Millennials, and everyone is fighting artificial intelligence.

Dogs vs. lemons on TikTok

The newest pet-related trend on TikTok is posting videos of dogs eating lemon slices. They are hilarious clips, because dogs don’t like lemons, so their excitement at catching some food from their master’s hand quickly turns into a sour-faced look and a side-eye look of dog-disappointment.

But because no one is allowed to have fun, some vets were quick to warn against this trend, pointing out that citrus can cause "gastrointestinal upsets" or even "severe clinical signs like collapse.“ Throwing food at a dog for them to catch is a choking hazard too, "particularly if the piece of food is too large to swallow whole," according to Dr. Anna Foreman of Everypaw Pet Insurance. So no one should ever huck a slice of lemon at their dog. Still, if you watch the videos, dogs almost never eat the lemon slices. They either give the 'em a quick lick and go, “nah," or they catch the fruit slice in their mouth and spit it out, because dogs aren’t stupid. 

What is the "Zoomer Perm"?

From the 1980s mullet to the ubiquitous “Rachel” of the '90s, every generation eventually develops and popularizes a ridiculous haircut they’ll be embarrassed about in the future. For Gen Z, it’s looking like the "Zoomer Perm" is going to be the generational ‘do. Sometimes called the "broccoli cut" or "bird's nest," the Zoomer Perm is shaved on the side and back and long and bushy/curly on the top. If you have straight hair, you gotta get it permed to do the look right. It’s a very dumb-looking haircut, but according to WikiHow, Zoomers like it because they “tend to not be as self-conscious or serious as other generations, so the funny things you can do with the broccoli cut are actually an upside, not a drawback.”  

Gamergate 2 update

Last week I brought you the regrettable news of the resurgence of Gamergate, but now there’s a new wrinkle: Gaming news site Kotaku’s editor-in-chief, Jen Glennon, resigned late last week, leading some to imagine the resignation was because of Kotaku's coverage of Gamergate 2.0.

Gamergate degenerates are, of course, wrong about this (and everything else). According to Glennon, the resignation was because the site’s owner, G/O Media, decided to change Kotaku's focus from news and editorial content to game guides, adding that G/O Media's CEO Jim Spanfeller is a herb. Lifehacker was once owned by G/O Media, so I say this with an insider's knowledge: There is no way G/O had any interest in or knowledge of what Kotaku was writing about.

Late Night with the Devil's AI controversy

In the first of what will probably be years of stories that ask “How much of this movie is AI?” The internet film community noticed that some images used in recently released indie horror flick Late Night with the Devil appear to be AI-generated. The film’s directors, Cameron and Colin Cairnes, quickly confirmed they had “experimented with AI for three still images” that appear as brief interstitials in the film. Reaction from the fan community is mixed. Some have called for a boycott of the movie or said they’d never see it. Some defended the movie. Some moderates called on people to sneak into theaters to see it. Totally apart from AI-generated art, Late Night with the Devil is one of the most innovative, creative, and unique horror movies I’ve seen in years. It will be streaming on Shudder starting on April 19. 

What is a "Quirk Chungus"?

Since the publication of Douglas Coupland’s Generation X in 1991, generational conflict discourse has been dominated by everyone agreeing that Baby Boomers suck. While that trend is alive and well on subreddits like r/boomersbeingfools, the new hotness is Generation Z bagging on Millennials for being lame. Generation Z has turned the withering eyes of youth on slightly older folks and found that liking Buzzfeed and Harry Potter, using words and phrases like “doggo,”“I just did a thing,” and “adulting” are actually lame—old-people shit. Some Gen-Z members are using the phrase “Quirk Chungus” to describe the “lol so random” aspect of Millennial culture. As a Gen Xer, Im glad no one ever blames us for anything or regards us as important enough to bother hating on, but I'd also like to point out that the most recognizable expression of Zoomer culture is Skibidi Toilet. Check out this YouTube video from KnowYourMeme for a deeper dive into the newest generational conflict.

Viral video of the week: I Used Only Vintage Technology for a Week

In this week’s viral video, YouTube comedian Kurtis Conner tasks himself with only using outdated tech for a week. It’s objectively funny to watch someone fully decked out with antique gear that barely works, and Conner is an amusing guy, but on another level, this video says something about the value and meaning of tech. Most of the gear he’s rocking would have been early-adopter-only when it was new 20 years ago, but now literally everything, from the wristwatch camera to the portable TV, the tiny voice recorder, Palm Pilot, to every function of the Xbernaut wearable computer, is available to everyone on even the cheapest smartphone. Is anyone happier? More fulfilled? I’d say “no,” but that’s what I’d always say to anything. 

'Likewise' Can Help You Finally Figure Out What to Watch

Entertainment enjoyers have been asking “What should we watch tonight?” since TV existed, but over the last few decades, technology has expanded the options from “whatever is on the three channels we get” to “almost everything that has ever been broadcast in human history”—leaving many paralyzed with choice, but no closer to answering the key question. Enter Likewise, an app aimed at giving you the best answer possible.

Founded by a team of ex-Microsoft employees with an investment from Bill Gates, Likewise has been working to improve entertainment recommendations for movies and TV, books, and podcasts since 2017.  “We were created to solve the absolute mess that is content discovery,” Likewise co founder and CEO Ian Morris told me. “Our mission is to provide every single person out there with their own personal entertainment.”

Likewise’s most recent addition is a fun-to-use TikTok-like infinite scroll interface and deeper integration of AI into its recommendation process. In press-release speak, Likewise works by “seamlessly integrating its AI-powered personal agent and leveraging advanced algorithms and 600 million consumer recommendations.” In practice, you download the Likewise App for iOS or Android, tell it some of the genres, movies, TV shows, books, and/or podcasts you like, and start poking around. 

How Likewise works

Likewise attacks the “what do I watch” problem from a couple of angles at once. It compiles an extensive profile of individuals users’ taste preferences and recommends based on that; it also links you with its community of over 2.5 million users, specifically to users who share tases with you, then lets you ask the community for its favorites. You can check out the lists curated and compiled by Likewise’s editorial staff, or use its AI agent to search using natural language.

Unlike the recommendation algorithms from a single streaming service, Likewise is cross-platform and community-driven, so it’s going to try to give you the best horror movies for you based on more than the formula Netflix uses, instead of providing the best horror movies for you that are also on Netflix (unless that’s what you ask for). 

“It’s designed to be action-oriented,” Morris explained. “If you see something you like, you can click the save button and save it to your watchlist, then see where it’s available for streaming. You have the Rotten Tomato ratings, and the IMDB rating, and community reviews, then you can play it on your Roku. So it’s not just a query engine.” 

Breaking out of the app

You can also use Likewise outside of your phone. A Likewise app is available on Roku, AppleTV, and Firestick, and can be used as a central hub for accessing media on those devices.  You can also contact Pix, Likewise’s AI agent, directly from the website, send it a text from your phone at (877) TEXTPIX, or send a question via email. Unlike asking ChatGPT, Pix will add the results of your query to your Likewise list.

Testing Likewise's AI with a ridiculous query

I like to mess with artificial intelligence, so I emailed Pix the following: "Compile a list of a movies that housewife in 1981 might enjoy if she was contemplating leaving her husband and children in order to pursue her dream of becoming a professional surfer."

Here is what Pix returned.

"Sounds like you're looking for some cinematic inspiration to catch that dream wave, am I right? 🏄‍♀️ I've whipped up a list of movies that would have resonated with a housewife in 1981, contemplating a wild life change towards professional surfing. Hope these help stir up that beachy ambition! 🌴

  • The Endless Summer (1966): A timeless classic in the world of surfing films. It's all about chasing summer around the world. Talk about surf's up, right? 🌞🏄‍♀️

  • An Unmarried Woman (1978): It's about a woman rediscovering herself after a divorce. It should resonate well with the idea of starting anew. 💔🔄💖

  • Breaking Away (1979): It's a coming-of-age story about chasing dreams, which might be a great source of inspiration for our 1981 housewife. 🏁🚲

  • Kramer vs. Kramer (1979): While it's about a divorce and custody battle, it puts a good perspective on the family aspect for someone considering leaving. 👪⚖️

  • Norma Rae (1979): This one's all about a woman standing up for what she believes in, despite the odds. Kind of the feel we're going for, right? ✊💪

  • Ordinary People (1980): This one would resonate well, as it's about a family trying to cope with the loss of one of their own. Might give some perspective on what the family might go through. 🏠💔

  • On Golden Pond (1981): An ageing couple's journey might just help our protagonist see her existing life from a fresh lens. 👵👴💖

While I absolutely loathe the writing style of AI when it's trying to be "casual," the movies are all in the ballpark, at least.

What People Are Getting Wrong This Week: Good Vs. Bad Movies

March is Oscar’s month, when Hollywood's attractive millionaires gather to congratulate each other for being so awesome while they embark on the fool's errand of declaring for posterity which movies are the best ones. So it's the perfect season to talk about bad vs. good films, and how no one, even awesome film industry professionals, can really know whether a movie is good or not.

In an inspired act of Oscar counter-programing, The Criterion Channel released a collection of 14 “Golden Raspberry” winning films to stream in March. These “worst of the worst” movies prove that that "badness" of a movie can be as unknowable as its "goodness."

Crash: When the “best picture” is actually horrible

If you consider the history of the Academy Awards (and ignore the subjective nature of our response to art), most Best Picture winners are “good” movies, in a flabby, middlebrow way, and most stay that way over time. Titanic is a good movie, I guess. So is Chariots of Fire, kind of. But some movies, for cultural reasons that can rarely be predicted, swing wildly from "the best" to "the worst" or vice versa based on the cultural world we live in when we see them. Sometimes critics, audiences, and “the industry” all think a movie is not only good, but the best, only to learn it's actually terrible later on. Crash, for example, went from best to trash in fewer than 20 years.

When it was released in 2005, Crash was seen as a courageous examination of race in America, a movie that was not afraid to "go there," as we said back in 2005. But Crash is really bad—it’s not “kind of OK, but didn’t deserve Best Picture over Brokeback Mountain” bad, but actively, undeniably, aggressively terrible. 

Even though the frames are same then as now, few people noticed how obvious, trite, and amateurish Crash was in 2005. It’s a movie populated with paper-thin characters who exist to wander into shallow, melodramatic, “racially charged” vignettes and preach at us. Crash has a message, and that’s where it goes from mediocre to odious. Despite its promise to "keep it real," as we said back in 2005, Crash is designed to comfort its liberal white audience, not confront it. Its message is something like “racism is bad, mmm-kay, but you are good because you totally give a shit.” Or, as critic Clarisse Loughrey pointed out: “Crash is the dad from Get Out’s favorite film.” 

So how did Crash manage to hide its mawkish mid-ness well enough to win a best picture Oscar? It was partly through the then-hot narrative device of non-linear storytelling, but it was mostly because the Academy is made up almost exclusively of the dad from Get Out. The target market for sensitive, middle-budget movies about race are the dad from Get Out too, and he's not going to miss an opportunity to congratulate himself for being not-racist, especially on Oscar night.

Cruising and Freddy Got Fingered: When “bad” movies are actually great

I’ve watched all of the Criterion’s Razzie collection, and a case could be made for the worthiness of any of these movies (with the exception of Gigli, a movie that has a 6% Rotten Tomatoes score and is still overrated), but two films stuck out to me as most deserving of reconsideration: Cruising and Freddy Got Fingered.

Directed by William Friedkin—whose credits include The Exorcist, Boys in the Band, and The French Connection—1980s Cruising is a hard-hitting crime drama/neo-noir set among the BDSM crowd in pre-AIDS New York. Al Pacino plays a detective who goes undercover in the leather daddy scene to catch a serial killer. 

Cruising is a tense, fast-paced, and fascinating thriller, but critics hated it. At first I thought maybe the graphic portrayal of violence and kinky man-on-man sex were a little much for critics in that less-enlightened time, but it turns out there was a different reason for Cruising’s critical beatdown: it was mostly a victim of events surrounding it. 

While it was in production, Cruising was at the center of a now-forgotten controversy. Gay activists protested over the fear that the film would stereotype all gay men as hedonistic, violent fetishists. Upon the film’s release, many critics decided Cruising’s enigmatic ending and its main character’s inscrutability were the result of a director knuckling under to outside pressure. Some panned it for the portrayal of gay men—and some critics, presumably, were just homophobes.

But seen through a 2024 lens and ignorant of the controversy it once caused, viewers can consider Cruising on its merits, and finally see the unflinching, taut, and fascinating thriller/psychological exploration that was always there. This is a matter of opinion, but Cruising seems to go to great pains to fairly represent the struggle and alienation gay men faced at the time, while making it clear that a small subculture doesn't represent gay people as a whole. The unclear resolution and Al Pacino's inarticulate main character's is-he-or-isn't-he journey doesn't seem like waffling from a scared filmmaker as much as a stab at illustrating how complex sexuality, violence, and identity can be. Three thumbs up.

Freddy Got Fingered is a masterpiece

Upon its release, Tom Green's 2001 comedy (I guess) Freddy Got Fingered was panned nearly as roundly as Gigli. Critics said it was scatological, puerile, annoying, and unfunny. As Roger Ebert put it: “This movie doesn't scrape the bottom of the barrel. This movie isn't the bottom of the barrel. This movie isn't below the bottom of the barrel. This movie doesn't deserve to be mentioned in the same sentence with barrels.”

All of that is true, but it was also ahead of its time. Green’s schtick was the first wide appearance of the wave of anti-comedy that went on to fuel The Eric Andre Show, Tim and Eric Awesome Show, and most of the internet. His shtick is not supposed to be “funny” in a traditional sense, but more off-putting and meta-funny. It’s funny because he keeps doing weird things that aren’t funny, leading us to question the nature of comedy and maybe chuckle at how stupid and excessive it is. 

But even if you don’t buy the anti-comedy pioneer angle, there’s a deeper level to Freddy Got Fingered in which the boundaries between life and art are stretched and shredded in a way that’s never been done before. If you strip away the gags about fellating horses or drinking toilet water, Freddy is the story of an unfunny weirdo who manages to annoy Hollywood jerks into giving him millions of dollars to make a TV show, which he promptly wastes on annoying people. This is the real story of Tom Green, and Freddy Got Fingered is both a fictionalized account of his journey and the result of it. It’s Tom Green saying, “People in suits actually gave me $14 million dollars to make this movie, and I’m going to blow it on a comedy with no jokes, no characters, and no point beyond me being annoying for 90 minutes. Now watch me roll around in deer guts.”

Lots of movies aim to be subversive, but not many actually subvert the artistic expectations of their genre. Freddy Got Fingered does, but the audiences and critics of 2005 saw Tom Green's antics and missed his larger point. "That's not even a joke" meant "this movie is bad" back in 2005, but it "hits different" now, as I'm told some people say in 2024. I don’t know if Freddy Got Fingered is genius, exactly, but it’s way more interesting than Crash.

The Out-of-Touch Adults' Guide to Kid Culture: Timothée Chalamet Memes

This week's trip into the world of young people culture takes us from the heights of a PSA that signals a positive shift in cultural ideas about Down Syndrome to the depths of a new incarnation of "Gamergate." Along the way we'll take a look at some memes about Timothée Chalamet and learn why, exactly, the music was so much better when you were young.

Timothée Chalamet: a generation’s most meme-able actor

Twenty-eight year old actor Timothée Chalamet starred in Dune, Wonka, and Dune 2 and has been nominated for an Academy Award, three Golden Globe Awards, and three BAFTAs. But he looks like a shoe. 

Since as early as 2020, people have been pointing out Chalamet’s resemblance to footwear. “Timothee Chalamet looks like a pointy italian shoe that was turned into a real boy by a witch's curse,” reads the first tweet about the phenomena. Check out this video and see if you agree. Or these side-by-side photos.

Shoes aren’t the only things Chalamet resembles, however. The first photos were released last week of the actor dressed as a young Bob Dylan for upcoming biopic A Complete Unknown, It looks like this: 

Timothée Chalamet as Bob Dylan
Credit: Crave Media - X

According to the internet, Chalamet looks like Fievel Mousekewitz from An American Tail. Or like “every single character in love actually.” Or like he’s “On his way to become a governess to a captain with seven children. Seven!” Or like “a Charles Dickens character with a jam band.”

I generally don’t celebrate bullying people online, but it’s all pretty good-natured, and he really does look like a shoe; plus, if Chalamet is mad, he can cry into a big pile of money.

This is why you hate young people’s music

Have you ever had a younger person play current music for you, and it sounds wrong and bad? It happens to me regularly. My teenager will pull up the Soundcloud of some underground rapper or bedroom producer he likes, and my (unspoken because I’m not an asshole) reaction is usually something like, “How can anyone like this shit?” 

It’s not the music itself necessarily; it’s the production—the mix. The drums are too low. The vocals are sludgy. There’s no separation. Etc, etc. “Why would anyone release something that sounds like this when professional production tools are easily available to anyone with a PC?” I’d think. But I think I figured out the reason. 

Since at least the 1950s, the music young people like was identifiable partly because older people hated it. The distorted, dissonant guitars of rock and roll and the hard-edged minimalism and obscenity-laden lyrics of hip hop sounded wrong to squares and parents, like mistakes or like something dangerous, so artists heaped it on. 

But at some point musicians ran out of runway. For rock, I’m going to say the 1987 release of Big Black’s Songs About Fucking marks the moment where no more distortion or noise could be applied to a recording and have it still reasonably be called “music.” You could pick a similar, arbitrary date for hip hop, too. Maybe NWA’s first album. As extreme as the content was at the time, though, both Songs About Fucking and Straight Outta Compton are expertly produced. 

Big Black’s Steve Albini went on to produce Nirvana’s culture-defining In Utero, an album today’s parents grew up on, rendering “noise and distortion” forever incapable of giving offense. NWA’s Straight Outta Compton is practically cuddly nostalgia in 2024. But in a glorious piece of teenage subversion, young artists recently (maybe unconsciously) recognized that they could still make music that sounds wrong and bad to squares like me, even if they can't do it through noise or curse words. The ingenious solution is the sludgy, imperfect, unlistenable mixes of today’s underground music. So the next time you catch yourself thinking about how music was so much better in your day, remember that it’s really just your old-ass ears; when your kids are old, it will be played in dentist offices.

Is Gamergate making a comeback? 

If you were lucky enough to have missed the first incarnation of “Gamergate” in 2014, I have bad news. The second version of the harassment-masquerading-as-activism movement is brewing within in the fetid hangouts of a new generation of online cranks and assholes. Gamergate 2.0 has dropped the faux concern about “ethics in video game journalism” in favor of just being against things it considers “woke,” but the tactics remain the same: Choose a target, make up things about them, then turn on the harassment hoses and fire up the death-threat cannons. This time around, the focal point of the anger is a small narrative design company called Sweet Baby Inc. The cover story for Gamergate’s harassment campaign involves the belief that this 16-employee company is dictating the editorial choices for the entire $214 billion game industry, including deciding the race of the main character in Alan Wake 2, the choices Kratos makes in the last God of War, and is responsible for basically every not-white, not-straight character in all of gaming. 

Encouragingly, the industry seems to be responding more aggressively this time, with the heads of game development companies pointing out that Gamergate jerks don’t understand how the games industry (or anything else) works, as companies hire consulting firms because they want the services they provide; consulting companies don’t dictate terms to their employers. So if Sweet Baby is providing woke-if-cation, it’s at the request of an industry that wants to be more woke, not less.  Another encouraging difference between this and the original Gamergate: The movement seems much smaller and sadder, with the Discord server where the harassment is organized having only around 2,000 members. 

Cheating in the connected age

I don’t have sympathy for them, but today’s cheaters have a harder time covering up their indiscretions than any previous generation. The number of apps and platforms which can gives you away is always increasing, and one small slip will give away the game. You can even get busted through fitness app Strava. 

In a recent video, TikToker meg.c.mcgee recounts the story of how she found proof of her husband’s infidelity through the running maps on Strava. His jogging route led directly from the home he shared with his wife to an illicit partner’s house a half mile away, and the unnamed dude didn’t set it to “private” or delete the data. Commenters on the post tell stories about catching cheating partners though Airbnb, Venmo, the AMC app (he took too many trips to movies she hadn’t seen), and secret calculator apps that look like innocent math aids but act as repositories for hidden photographs. 

Viral Video of the Week: Assume That I Can

This week’s viral video is a public service announcement from the National Down Syndrome Society that’s really hitting a nerve with people—the ad has been viewed nearly 30 million times on TikTok and even more on Instagram. It challenges viewers to consider how the limitations we place on people with Down syndrome become self-fulfilling prophesies. “Coach, you assume that I can’t hit harder,” actress and model Madison Tevlin says in the vid, “so you don’t train me to hit harder.”

The ad basically plays out like a standard do-gooder PSA, the kind of thing that might get 5,000 views, but then Tevlin informs us she can, in fact, “recite fucking Shakespeare.” After a pause, she asks, “You assumed I couldn’t swear, right?” 

I didn’t assume that, but I did assume that the people making a PSA about Down syndrome would infantilize its subjects in the name of good taste or respectability, so it’s refreshing and powerful that they refuse to, and instead acknowledge that cursing, drinking, and having sex aren’t special privileges for the neurotypical or something that we should never talk about in connection with people with intellectual disabilities, but are basic human rights that everyone should have the option of enjoying.  

You Can Get This Poputar T2 Smart Guitar on Sale for $324 Right Now

You can get the Poputar T2 Smart Acoustic Guitar on sale for $323.99 right now (reg. $430). The guitar comes with an app with a large library of songs your instrument can show you how to play using LED guides built into the fretboard. From the app, you can also access video guitar lessons and other learning materials to help you play. The guitar itself is made with a solid spruce top panel and mahogany on the back and sides, and its compact 36-inch design is lightweight and can be stored in the included guitar bag. Fully charged, the Poputar's battery can last up to 10 hours, but you can also use it as a standard acoustic guitar after the battery dies. 

You can get the Poputar T2 Smart Acoustic Guitar on sale for $323.99 right now (reg. $430), though prices can change at any time. 

What People Are Getting Wrong This Week: The Fruit of the Loom Logo

I haven’t talked about “The Mandela effect” in this column because it’s silly. People think they saw a movie called Shazaam where Sinbad played a Genie because there was a movie called Kazaam where Shaq played a genie. People remembered Nelson Mandela’s funeral before it happened because they half-watched coverage of Nelson Mandela being freed from prison years earlier and are remembering that. There’s no alternative universe necessary to explain any of it. 

That said, it’s easy to explain away other people’s fake memories. When it comes to memories that I have, things get weird. I remember things I would have staked my life on, that are shared by thousands/millions of other people, yet all available evidence says they are false. I know that Johnny Carson's co-host Ed McMahon did not appear in super bowl ads for Publisher’s Clearing House, but I remember the commercials anyway, and can describe the van, the house, and the bunch of balloons that Ed brought to go with the comically over-sized check. I know that in the James Bond movie Moonraker, there is no shot of Dolly, Jaw’s love interest, smiling at him to reveal that she wears braces. But I remember it.

There are explanations for both Moonraker and Ed McMahon, but personally accepting them instead of what I know I remember is difficult. Still, I can’t argue with the facts:

  • The Publisher’s Clearing House commercials existed, but didn’t star McMahon. He was spokesperson for a rival, less well known company. So I’m mixing up his ads with theirs

  • Dolly isn't wearing braces, but if you look at the scene, she clearly should be. This is a case where our collective memory improved a mistake by Moonraker’s producers. 

But then there’s the Fruit of the Loom logo.

The enduring mystery of the Fruit of the Loom logo Mandela effect

That underwear vendor Fruit of the Loom’s logo once featured a cornucopia is as close to a universal Mandela Effect as I’ve seen. Just about everyone seems to remember it, but the company says it never happened. As this article on Snopes makes clear, there’s no evidence of this alternative logo ever having existed. There are photos (easily faked), and a supposed trademark application, but those fall apart under scrutiny. 

Unlike most Mandela effects, there’s been actual research on the Fruit of the Loom logo. Overall, this University of Chicago study indicates that people are just bad at remembering logos, but the research can’t find any reason people tend to mis-remember logos in specific ways. I suspect some of it is like Moonraker, people substituting a “better” design—the Monopoly man should be sporting a monocle in keeping with his “old-timey-rich-guy" character—but why would we, collectively, put a cornucopia behind the fruit on our underwear? I don’t think I’ve ever seen a cornucopia in real life, so I don’t associate it with fruit. When researchers showed study participants a Fruit of the Loom logo with a plate behind the fruit, (plates and fruit being something we've all seen linked) they still largely regarded the cornucopia as the legit Fruit of the Loom mark. 

Underwear logos and the butterfly effect

I doubt we're seeing an example of a parallel universe that’s just like ours, except the logo of an underwear company is different. I think we’re seeing something closer to the Butterfly Effect. Something happened, maybe some tiny thing, at some point in time, and it resonated within the complicated inter-connected systems that make up our collective memory and managed to create a strong enough signal that most people associate a cornucopia with the Fruit of the Loom logo. But no one has identified what that something is. It sounds crazy, but there’s at least one example that’s similar where the cause was found and identified.

The colors of letters and synesthesia

Research suggests that about 3% of the population have synesthesia, a phenomenon in which stimuli is perceived simultaneously through more than one pathway. Synesthetes might taste mint when they hear the word “floor,” or know what yellow sounds like. Certain kinds of connections are more common than others, and grapheme-color synesthesia, the association of colors with letters and numbers, is the most often reported. In 2012, MIT scientist Nathan Witthoft was studying this form of synesthesia and found that a greater-than-average number of participants grouped the same color and number, and the results became even more striking for people of specific ages. 

(Before you read on, what color is E?)

Taken as a single data point, there’s no “this is silly” explanation for different people connecting the same letters with the same colors. You could account for this by theorizing a collective unconscious, or an as-yet-undocumented connection between different senses, but there’s a more mundane theory too: Fisher-Price magnetic letters.

Back in the early 1970s, Fisher-Price released its first set of magnetized alphabet letters. It became very popular. The E was blue, and that was the kind of connection that about 15% of participants born between 1970 and 1985 made. (It’s a little more complicated than this, as some researchers haven’t been able to make similar connections in other cultures, but for the sake of argument, it’s what I’m going with.) 

So the release of a toy in the early 1970s determined generations of people’s ideas of what color different letters are, and helped explain aspects of synesthesia, but no one nailed it down for more than 40 years. So it is, I believe, with the cornucopia. There was some, maybe totally unrelated, cultural stimuli that was commonly experienced involving a cornucopia, maybe that connected it with briefs, but we collectively forgot about it, and now we only have the echoes left.

I associate cornucopias with Thanksgiving. It seems to be the only time they're a "thing," and Thanksgiving is exactly when Fruit of the Loom might have release commercials aimed at Christmas shoppers. So maybe that's where this connection comes from. Or maybe it’s something else entirely.

How to Win at 'Strands,' the NYT's Latest Word Game

Strands, the New York Times’ still-in-beta word search game, is now on its 10th puzzle. The first two or three puzzles were relatively tame, with solvers complaining that the hint gave too much away and the game wasn’t very challenging. But you and I know better, right? As I pointed out last week, the puzzle’s creators have dropped hints that it’s going to get a lot trickier. That’s begun, and hoo boy, people are mad. 

Before you read any further, know that this article includes spoilers and outright answers for the March 13, 2024 game of Strands. Here is the link to play today’s game, so you can suffer along with the rest of us. Then come back and we’ll discuss what you just experienced. (And if you’re catching up later, here’s a fan-created archive where you can play the March 13 game even if you are reading this from the future.) 

Strands #10
“One thousand followers”
🔵🔵🟡🔵
🔵🔵🔵🔵


Alright, friends. We need to discuss a few things about how the puzzles are constructed, and what expectations and assumptions are built in. This puzzle is new, so it’s okay if you haven’t figured everything out yet! We’re learning together. 

Think of the “theme” like a crossword clue

If you solve crosswords, especially NYT crosswords, you’ll have a huge head start over everyone else when it comes to understanding tricky Strands themes. Remember, in Strands, “today’s theme” is the clue you get when you open the page. I think of it as being the title of the puzzle.

Here’s what you need to know: the theme is a clue for the spangram (the yellow word or phrase). The spangram, in turn, describes what the blue words have in common.

Sometimes the theme is a pretty straightforward clue: for example, 

  • “Mark my words” went with the spangram PUNCTUATION. (Blue words: COMMA, APOSTROPHE…)

  • “She’ll have a ball” went with the spangram CINDERELLA. (Blue words: PUMPKIN, SLIPPER…)

  • “I gotta dip!” went with the spangram GUACAMOLE. (Blue words: AVOCADO, JALAPENO…)

Simple, right? That’s because they’re starting us off easy. There have been some trickier ones: 

  • “To put it mildly” was EUPHEMISMS.

  • “Ruler’s decree” was MEASUREMENTS. (That’s “ruler” as in a yardstick, not a king)

I’m convinced that this is a word search designed for crossword aficionados. Personally, I’m here for it: I love NYT crosswords, especially ones like Thursdays and Sundays that are full of clever themes and wordplay. For example, here are some crossword clues that I’ve chuckled at in the past week: 

This is what’s going on when “One thousand followers” becomes GRAND FINALE, as in the March 13 Strands theme. A grand is one thousand, and a finale is an ending. The puzzle asks us to find endings for the phrase “GRAND ____.”

Expect fill-in-the-blank categories

Now that we’re getting the hang of it, the blue words are sometimes wordplay based on the theme/spangram. Just as in Connections, words aren’t always grouped together for being members of a category or synonyms for each other. We’ve seen all kinds of tricky combinations there, including homophones and anagrams. (Remember ATE, FOR, TOO, WON as homophones of the numbers 8, 4, 2, 1?)

So what kind of wordplay can we expect in Strands? (Fortunately, anagrams won’t really work.) Recall that the NYT hinted we might see “fill-in-the-blanks” someday. That’s happened twice already. Just a few days ago, we had this puzzle: 

  • Theme: “FRAGILE: Handle with care” 

  • Spangram: BREAKABLE

  • Words: HEART, SILENCE, PROMISE, BREAD, MOLD, SWEAT, RECORD.

Get it? They all refer to idioms where we “break” something: you can break bread with somebody, or break their heart, or you can sound like a broken record. 

The reason March 13’s puzzle is so tricky is that it uses both a crossword-style clue for the spangram, and Connections-style fill-in-the-blanks for the blue words. I’m going to spoil it all here, since you were already warned: 

  • Theme: “One thousand followers” 

  • Spangram: GRAND FINALE

  • Words: [grand] PRIZE, [grand] JURY, [Grand] CENTRAL, [Grand] CANYON, [grand] SLAM, [Grand] RAPIDS, [grand] PIANO.

Get it? Get it??? I’m sorry, I was tickled by this once I figured it out. It also took me a good long while to get it, because this is a tough puzzle! It takes a few leaps of logic to get those “aha!” moments.

Anyway, people who were expecting a simple word search are mad. Here’s a Reddit thread full of complaints that the spangram doesn’t match the theme, or that “finale” should have been a word on its own. (It could have been, but then you don’t get the cute construction of GRAND + [synonym for ending].) 

Many of the complaints on this and other hard puzzles are from people who aren’t native English speakers, and that’s a totally valid criticism. (Lots of folks were stumped by GADZOOKS the other day—you kind of had to read a certain era of comic books for that to even register as a word.) Hard word puzzles are not always accessible to everyone, which is both a problem and the whole point of the puzzle. If you solve something by reaching into your brain for some obscure knowledge or by connecting two concepts in an outside-the-box kind of way, that’s an amazing feeling, and makes the whole puzzle worth it!

I’m impressed with Strands (and have high hopes for it graduating from beta) because it can run that whole gamut from easy to devilish, depending on how sadistic the constructor is feeling that day. Getting the “aha” moment on a tricky one is the kind of thrill I live for (I don’t live a very exciting life). Bottom line: This is not an easy puzzle. If you know and love the wordplay tricks of both Crosswords and Connections, you’ll be into Strands. Just don’t expect it to be easy.


The Out-of-Touch Adults' Guide to Kid Culture: John Cena's Naked Oscar Walk

Sometimes, there just isn't much happening. Youth culture this week seems to be hibernating, but it's a good opportunity to take a look at the kind of minuscule micro-trends that you might otherwise gloss over. Maybe these tiny, no-one-thinks-about-them things reveal more than the groundbreaking things everyone notices. Probably not, but you never know.

Viral video of the week: John Cena at the Oscars

I’m sure you’ve seen the video of John Cena presenting the Academy Award for Best Costuming at the Oscars on March 10. After being broadcast live and posted online, the wrestler-turned-actor’s naked appearance has been seen by millions of people. It represents a rare moment of cultural relevance among young people for the “no-one-really-cares-about this-anymore” film industry. People were moved enough by something at the Oscars to shoot reaction videos, and make jokes and memes. The bit is certain to go down in history as one of the most memorable moments at an Oscar presentation, and it even touched the fringe-iest fringe-conspiracy theorists, the remnants of Q-Anon. Q-Anon doesn't see anything funny about Cena’s appearance. “This is not just a humiliation ritual — the Hollywood pedophiles, rapists and perverts are certainly getting off on this. I’m sure Jimmy Kimmel is as well!” Reported Liz Krokin on Twitter, “Kimmel ran another skit on his show featuring an FBI-identified pedophile symbol in it and a pizza. Pizza is pedophile code that’s  been confirmed by the FBI, DOJ records and local law enforcement agencies,” they continued. “Absolutely disgusting…Nobody wants to see a naked John Cena on TV.” Twitter user American Mama opined, with her finger on the pulse of popular culture. It's interesting how Q-Anon seems to view Cena as a victim in all this, as if Jimmy Kimmel forced him to disrobe against his will.

Stanley announces new products at South By Southwest

Austin, Texas hosts the South By Southwest festival every spring in order to “celebrate the convergence of tech, film, music, education, and culture.” This year, one of the highlights of the festival was a new cup-holder.

At a standing-room only panel on Saturday, Stanley 1913, the company behind the immortal, fireproof coffee cup, announced a new, hands-free cup caddy and a mini soft cooler, to the collective excitement of its many, mostly young fans. 

Stanley’s story is fascinating if you’re the kind of person who’s interested in the minutia of late capitalism. They’ve been kicking around since 1913, when William Stanley Jr. invented the vacuum seal technology behind vessels that maintain the temperature of liquids. Stanley, the company, was known mostly for making thermoses to keep your coffee hot while camping or on a job site, so it was pretty much a dude company, a maker of something to take fishing. But recently, the company decided to focus on women, specifically young women on TikTok, and went from annual profits of around $70 million a year in 2019 to around $750 million a year in 2024. The company’s flagship product, the 40-ounce Stanley Quencher, has become a must-have for Gen Z and Millennials, both for its many colors and the fact that it's actually a really great cup. 

The Satana Trend, explained

Sometimes I like to dig deeply into the minutia of the youth culture, and this week I’ve uncovered the micro-trend of Satana, which I'm willing to bet you've never head of. Satana comes from the Balkans, where TikToker @stafon71 posted a video of himself scuffing the floor under his desk with his heel, set to the tune “"Satana Eto Ona.” The video was viewed nearly 36 million times. Variations on the theme quickly appeared, including this impressive half-circle, this video of a black-shoe wearer making a scuff and having it erased by someone in white shoes, and this video that depicts the imagined reaction of the person who has to clean the school’s floors. What does it all mean? Probably nothing, but it’s impressive how a school kid scuffing a floor with his shoe could gain international attention. 

Stock image at center of cultural debate online

stock photo of "real young man"
Credit: istock

The unassuming photo you see above is from iStock, and is at the center of a small debate about the loneliness crisis among young men. Entitled “real young man,” and published on iStock in 2011, the image came to light when it was posted on Twitter by @orbitves with the caption “the ‘male loneliness crisis’ is a good thing actually, because why would i ever want to date a guy that looks like this?”

Reactions were mixed. Many posted comments like “ha, that’s funny and a little true.” Some pointed to hypocrisy behind the post, like @TheStrxggler, who tweeted, “Body positivity crowd is shaming bodies again.” Or expressed sympathy for the model, like @WheelchairUser8 who tweeted, "imagine being this poor mf just trying to make a couple bucks from a stock image shoot and out of nowhere every fuckass radfem on twitter is blasting your face everywhere saying no one should ever date you."

The “looksmaxx” crowd had a more constructive take on the matter, and pointed out a number of ways that the stock photo model could improve his appearance, like if he lost 30 pounds, and got a better haircut, he might end up looking like this:

Improved stock photo of real young man
Credit: KnowYourMeme

What does “green fn” mean?

The last stop of my trip through the minutia of youth culture this week is the phrase “green fn.” People have been spamming it all over TikTok's comments lately, and here's what it means: "Green fn" is an interjection you might scream when you’ve done something impressive or cool, but it’s also what someone else might say when you’ve done something clumsy or inept.

Its origin is obscure enough that it’s a good bet that most people who use it don’t know where it came from, but here’s the story: The “green” part is a reference to the NBA 2K series of video games, where the quality of a basketball shot is measured using color and green is as good as it gets. 

The “fn” part is short for “fuck n*gga.” It comes from this video, where “Green fn” is used to comment on a missed basket. From there, it began to be featured in ironic memes and sincere memes as well as showing up in many, many TikTok comment sections. Like all youth slang, it’s important that you not use it. Stick with “boo-YAH!” instead—the “green FN” of your youth.

You Can Get Promova Premium on Sale for $80 Right Now

You can get a lifetime subscription to Promova Premium on sale for $79.99 right now (reg. $299.99). Promova is a top 10-rated language-learning app in the App Store and top 20 on the Google Play store, and while it’s more designed for people learning English as a second language, you can practice nine other languages for far less than other platforms. (Languages include English, Spanish, Arabic, Chinese, French, German, Italian, Korean, Portuguese, and Ukrainian.) The app includes features like five-minute lessons, gamified quizzes, grammar exercises, speaking practice, and reading. There’s even a specialized mode for people with dyslexia.

You can get a lifetime subscription to Promova Premium on sale for $79.99 right now (reg. $299.99), though prices can change at any time.

You Can Get Rosetta Stone and StackSkills Unlimited on Sale Right Now

You can get a lifetime subscription to Rosetta Stone and StackSkills Unlimited on sale for $151.99 right now (reg. $849) with promo code ENJOY20. Rosetta Stone includes 25 languages like Spanish, French, German, Mandarin Chinese, and Arabic, all featuring interactive lessons, speech-recognition technology, and topics from conversations to business and travel. 

The other half of the bundle is StackSkills Unlimited, an e-learning platform with more than 1,000 courses and new materials added all the time. It includes subjects like IT, marketing, business, graphic design, or additional language courses with expert-led instruction.

You can get Rosetta Stone and StackSkills Unlimited for life on sale for $151.99 right now (reg. $849) with promo code ENJOY20 through March 10 at 11:59 p.m. PT, though prices can change at any time.

The Out-of-Touch Adults' Guide to Kid Culture: the Disastrous Willy Wonka 'Chocolate Experience'

The themes for this week examination of what's going on with kids is failure and fiasco. There's the ever-expanding story of the disastrous Willy Wonka rip-off in Scotland, a dubious theory about the history of America's "culture wars," and Reddit making a doomed attempt to monkey-wrench AI. There is a success to even the scales, though: a YouTube deep dive into the Barbie cinematic universe.

The second level of Wonka-Gate drama

I'm sure you're already aware of the drama around "Willy's Chocolate Experience," the Willy Wonka-like "immersive experience" that went terribly, hilariously, Fyre-Festival-wrong in Glascow, Scotland. The imbroglio has so captured the imagination of the world that a second level of drama is emerging, beyond the tales of the ripped-off parents and horrified children who attended the event. The internet's curious amateur investigators are digging up every detail of the Wonka-nightmare, and here are some of the treasures they've uncovered.

  • The actress who played "The Unknown," an unsettling, AI-generated villain created for the Willy experience that has no connection to Willy Wonka, has spoken out about her experience playing the part. Her name is Felicia, she's 16, from Glascow, and this was her first acting gig.

  • Actor/comedian Paul Connell, the actor who played Willy McDuff, has gone public as well, but he may regret it. A woman claiming to be a former student of Connell posted then deleted several videos accusing him of engaging in a romantic relationship with her when she was 16 and he was 22. (This news really darkens the "isn't this wacky?" vibe of the whole experience.)

  • As you might have guessed, some of the actors who worked on the Willy Chocolate Experience say they have not been paid the amount they were promised, and they may sue the event's organizer.

  • A Scottish production company has announced it is working on a horror movie centered on The Unknown. Whether anyone will remember this whole thing when the film is released in late 2024 is an open question, as is the issue of who owns the rights to the character of The Unknown.

  • If you're looking for a costume for Halloween, you could do worse than dressing as The Unknown. Here are links to all you need to be the king/queen of trick or treating.

What does "neurospicy" mean?

If someone describes themselves as "neurospicy," they're calling themselves "neurodivergent" in a cute, slang-y way. Since it's not a real word, the term doesn't refer to any specific mental illness, but can refer to OCD, autism, depression, or really anything. It's almost always used to refer to oneself instead of others.

Are we trapped in 2014?

There are a growing number of people online who think we're trapped in 2014; not in a literal "Time is a conspiracy!" way, but culturally. The idea of "The Long 2014" is that that year marked the start of the current "culture-war," and we have not moved past it in a decade. Ten years ago, the argument goes, a cultural argument about inclusion kicked off with GamerGate. Back then, people on the "lets not be assholes to people" side were derided as "social justice warriors" and now they're called "woke," but the arguments have not changed, and we've been rehashing and repeating them on endless loop since, never making progress.

It's an interesting theory, but a product of people who lack historical perspective. It's young people confusing their own awareness of a cultural trend with the trend's beginning. The truth is, we've been having versions of these same arguments in different forms for a lot longer than a decade. Back in the 1990s, people who were in favor of social justice were derided with the term "politically correct," instead of "woke," and before that, they were called "women's-libbers," "bleeding hearts," "abolitionists," "suffragettes," and any number of other invectives that basically mean the same thing. Like William Faulkner wrote back in 1951, "The past is never dead. It's not even past."

Why is everyone on Reddit saying "Bazinga"?

If you're noticing the word "Bazinga" popping up in confusing ways on Reddit memes, you're not witnessing a resurgence of fandom for The Big Bang Theory. Instead, it's Redditors trying to confuse artificial intelligence. Recently, it was revealed that Reddit will be working with Google to train Google's AI using comments from the site. But in the past, ChatGPT has gotten "hung up" on words if it has no context for them, giving gibberish responses when asked about them. So the idea is to repeat "Bazinga" in different context, completely randomly, with no explanation, in order to trip up the AI.

Sadly, it's not likely to work. The words that confused AI in the past were things like "SolidGoldMagikarp" or "TheNitromeFan," Reddit usernames that were frequently posted, but without definitions. But "Bazinga" already has an established meaning, (ie: "that annoying, manufactured catchphrase from The Big Bang Theory."), and even if it didn't, Redditor's usage of the phrase isn't actually random. AI is smart enough to figure out that "Bazinga," in a certain context, can mean "a word redditors use to try to trick artificial intelligence" and will probably be able to add its own "random" usages too.

Viral video of the week: I Watched Every Barbie Movie Ever Made

YouTube's most important contribution to our culture might end up being videos that take a deep dive into pop cultural detritus that would otherwise go unexamined. It's always good when people ignore the things that people tell you are "serious" in favor of things they've decided to take seriously. Like this week's viral video, where YouTuber Ted Nivision watches all 42 Barbie movies in order to "develop a concrete and airtight theory on what the true lore of the Barbie Cinematic Universe, also known as the BCU, is." Clocking in at nearly two hours, this video really goes deep, incorporating a classic "strings connecting papers on a whiteboard" organizational structure, and actually coming up with a workable framework for the BCU.

The Out of Touch Adults’ Guide to Kid Culture: The TikTok Chocolate-Covered Strawberries, Explained

All decent people look back at their youth and think, "I sure was a callow idiot" (but hopefully in an affectionate way). Remembering the combination of grandiosity and dumb-i-osity that you once embodied is really the key to understanding younger people, because what could be grander and dumber than making a bowl of strawberries internationally famous?

TikTok’s hottest superstar is a bowl of strawberries and chocolate

The video is nothing special: It's a single shot with a bunch of zooms and Bobby Caldwell’s 1978 song “What You Won’t Do for Love” playing in the background. It's not dissimilar to hundreds of thousands, maybe millions, of clips of people showing off their food on TikTok, but something about the timing and content of this one sent it into the stratosphere. No one knows why—which I find inexplicably unsettling in a "maybe we are all ghosts" way—but once it was in front of people, they started liking it (who doesn't like strawberries?). Then people caught on to how strange it was, and viewing, sharing, and commenting upon the strawberries became participatory group-humor. TikTok’s user base is now consciously fighting to make the strawberry video the most liked piece of content on the site, just to be funny. The current TikTok "likes" champion is this lip-sync from Bella Poarch with 64.1 million likes that was posted in 2017. Strawberries are at 37.3M in only three weeks. I think it can win.

What are “showing up to the competition” memes?

I love meme formats that are difficult to explain but easy to illustrate, like the “showing up to the competition” images that are taking over TikTok this month. The gist: showing a video of yourself arriving at a ridiculous competition, and learning you’ve been bested by an even more ridiculous competitor. Like this video entitled “When you show up to the being late competition and your opponent isn’t there yet.” Or “Me arriving to the kindest person competition but my opponent didn’t show up just so I can win.” Or “When I show up to the spreading misinformation competition but my opponent gave me the wrong address.” Or “When I show up for the gaslighting competition and it isn’t even real.” If you’d like to enjoy more of these videos, there are dozens, maybe hundreds, of examples at this link for the atonal piano soundtrack that accompanies them.

The “how many cubes are on the trailer?” controversy explained

Trailer cube puzzle
Credit: @Rainmaker1973 - Twitter/X

How many cubes are on the truck above? That’s the deceptively complicated question  @Rainmaker1973 asked on a recent post that went viral on Twitter. A little back-of-the-envelope math gives an answer of 51 (There’s 3×7 cubes on the lowest level, the second 3×6 in the middle, and the top has 3×4 boxes.) But is that the correct answer? It depends.

51 is only the right answer if you assume that every layer has three cubes, but we don't have a view that accounts for all the cubes; so it could be fewer than 51 cubes on the truck if they're arranged in an unexpected way. For that matter, who can say if the cubes we can’t see are the same size as the cubes we can see? They could be several blocks wide in the middle, for instance, and so there would be fewer still because part of the truck cargo wouldn't be cubes at all.

An image with a 3/4 diagonal view would make it clear, but that’s not the point of these kinds of purposefully confusing math and logic puzzles. The real puzzle is figuring out what information is missing from the original question so that you can respond, “There is no answer.” This is fun, but if realizing there is no answer is presented as a measure of intelligence, that's wrong too, because 51 is the right answer, from a certain point-of-view. One of the accepted “rules” of doing a puzzle is that all the information is provided to reach a solution. Assuming that’s the case here doesn’t make you wrong. To be on the safe side, I’d answer “51*” with a note explaining the problems with the puzzle itself. 

What does the gaming world think of Skull and Bones, the “first AAAA video game?”

On Feb. 16, video game company Ubisoft released Skull and Bones for the Xbox. In the lead up to its release, CEO Yves Guillemot defended the game’s $70 price tag on a corporate earnings call by saying, “It’s a really full, triple…quadruple-A game, that will deliver in the long run.” So the first AAAA video game: What does that mean, exactly?

The phrase “AAA game” is an informal way of describing the set of video games that are full-priced titles released by established game publishers, so Guillemot is apparently saying its new game is one whole A bigger and better than previously released games. 

So is it? No; at least, not according to critics and gamers. Skull and Bones has a Metacritic score of 60, and a “Generally Unfavorable” rating from users. The critical consensus is that there are things that are good about Skull and Bones, but overall, it is boring and seems dated. Gamers themselves were a little more direct, posting videos like this one:

The Out-of-Touch Adults' Guide to Kid Culture: TikTok's Couple-Painting Trend

There's a fine line between laughing at people and laughing with them, and it's often blurred on the internet, so, just to be clear: I am laughing with the TikTok couples who spend date night painting terrible portraits of each other. But I am laughing at Florida police officers who open fire because an acorn falls on their police car. When it comes to AI text-to-video tool Sora, I am not laughing.

Couples painting each other on TikTok

Young couples on TikTok can be incredibly annoying when they do things like refuse to wear shoes, but there are also heartwarming couple trends, like clips of stay-at-home dates where couples paint each other’s portrait. The videos these evenings produce are glorious—there’s the suspense as you wait for the images to be revealed, but no matter how terrible you think the painting will be, it’s somehow worse. At the same time, there’s something charming in how sincere this art is, and I really like videos of people who are in love and laughing uncontrollably. Plus, the trend is new enough that I can’t find any “real” artist couples doing awesome pictures of each other because they’re so much better than everyone else—nor are there any easily accessible, unfunny parody videos.

Viral video of the week: the acorn-cop incident

This week’s viral video comes courtesy of the body cameras of two Florida law enforcement officers and the Freedom of Information Act. In a video that is both hilarious and terrifying, we see Okaloosa County Sheriff’s Deputy Barney Fife, er, sorry, Jesse Hernandez, approaching his patrol car parked on a quiet street. A handcuffed suspect waits within to be taken to jail. Suddenly, an acorn falls from a tree, and Hernadez reacts by screaming “shots fired!” while somersaulting away. He adds “I’m hit!” and draws his weapon.

Nearby, Sergeant Beth Roberts is talking to a witness. She hears the commotion and pulls out her own gun; then both cops start firing at Hernandez’s patrol car. Roberts is shooting towards Hernandez who is taking cover from the angry squirrel behind a nearby car. The pair unload at least 20 bullets into the vehicle, while an unnamed witness at the scene exhorts them to not kill the person in the car.

Ultimately, the acorn was uninjured in the firefight. The suspect in the back of the car also escaped injury—miraculous given the number of bullets that were aimed toward him—and officer Hernandez resigned while the incident was investigated. Don’t worry, the officers were cleared of any criminal wrongdoing. 

The video was posted by YouTuber PoliceActivity on February 13 and quickly spread everywhere, inspiring response memes like this one: 

Reno 911 meme
Credit: Know your meme

and this:

Danny Devito meme
Credit: Know your meme

Hopefully the acorn-cop case will also inspire a serious national conversation about how police are absolutely insane and why do we let these yahoos have guns anyway? 

What is Sora?

This week, OpenAI, the people who brought us ChatGPT, unveiled their newest threat to humanity: Sora. The generative AI model translates user text into startlingly lifelike (or surreal) videos that are a cut above any AI videos that have come before. These clips are rich in detail, feature full camera movement, multiple subjects, complex lighting, etc., all produced in moments based on a few lines of text. At a glance, or even a longer look, Sora’s videos are nearly indistinguishable from “real” videos. Just click the demo above to see what I mean—all those clips were supposedly created by Sora directly. Sora is not available to the public yet. OpenAI says it is “taking several important safety steps” by “working with red teamers—domain experts in areas like misinformation, hateful content, and bias—who are adversarially testing the model,” which is not terrifying at all.

Highlights from Nintendo Direct

This week, Nintendo showed off a slew of upcoming third-party games coming to its Switch console, announcing some new titles and revealing the release dates for others. I’ve embedded the video above, but if you don’t have 25 minutes to spare for Nintendo, here are some of the highlights:

  • Grounded, an action game from Obsidian where players are shrunk to a tiny size and must survive their backyard, will be released on April 16.

  • Pentiment, also from Obsidian, is a narrative-driven game set in in early sixteenth-century Bavaria. It will be available on Switch on February 22.

  • Disney Epic Mickey: Rebrushed is coming at some point in 2024. It’s an improved version of 2010’s Epic Mickey.

  • Turn-based strategy game Unicorn Overlord will be released on March 8. 

  • Star Wars: Battlefront Classic Collection is the first two Battlefront games with new playable characters and maps. 

  • World of Goo 2, a sequel to the much-loved puzzle game, will be a Switch exclusive and hits consoles on May 23.

  • Endless Ocean Luminous, a sequel to undersea adventure game Endless Ocean, hits the Switch store on May 2. It features online play where up to 30 gamers can share the same ocean. 

The Out-of-Touch Adults' Guide to Kid Culture: How SpongeBob Won the Super Bowl

The undeclared national holiday of Super Bowl Sunday has passed once again, leaving behind only memories and memes. But also, we'll delve into this week's debate over yellow paint in video games, take a look at "legging legs," and find out what co-worker core is.

Viral Video of the Week: Nickelodeon's Super Bowl coverage

This week’s Super Bowl was among the most predictable in recent memory—after an impossibly dull first half, Taylor Swift led the Kansas City Chiefs to a narrow victory over the San Francisco 49ers. But there was one surprise, brought to the world by SpongeBob Squarepants. While most of us were watching the coverage on CBS, smart people were watching Nickelodeon’s coverage on Paramount+ where SpongeBob SquarePants and Patrick Star joined CBS Sports analyst Nate Burleson for play-by-play coverage of the game.

The Bikini Bottom boys absolutely destroyed Jim Nantz and Tony Romo’s lackluster game-calling. Highlights include Dora the Explorer suggesting the 49ers could use a map to find the end zone, onscreen graphics referring to Travis Kelce as “Taylor Swift’s Boyfriend,” crowd-shots of Bikini Bottom superstars like Clamuel L. Jackson and Doja Catfish, and the ceremonial sliming of the end zone after each touchdown (that would be three slimings in five quarters). Sadly, the entire broadcast isn’t available to watch online, but you can enjoy SpongeBob’s live performance of "Sweet Victory” that kicked off the game. 

The Super Bowl commercial about Jesus

This year's Super Bowl commercials were mostly lazy variations of “Here's the most famous person we could get to be in our commercial,” but one ad did manage to capture people’s attention: This advertisement for Jesus. It consists of static AI-generated images of the Son of God washing people’s feet, leading many to ask, “Is Jesus a foot guy?” The ad, paid for by the people behind Hobby Lobby, is part of their billion-dollar campaign aimed at humanizing Jesus.

Dark Brandon made a post-Super Bowl appearance

Another highlight surrounding the big game this week: The White House’s official X account posted a meme picture of Joe Biden as Dark Brandon with the caption “Just like we drew it up,” confirming the worst fears of conspiracy theorist everywhere. Biden (or more accurately, some idealistic young intern in the Biden administration's social media department) also launched a TikTok account where he says he’d “get in trouble” if he revealed whether he’d fixed the Super Bowl. When asked about the White House's new social media account, Biden said, "Yeah, I made a ticky-tock, what's it to you, brother?" in my imagination.

Why are gamers obsessed with yellow paint?

While some people focused on the Super Bowl, video game aficionados (or "gamers" for short) debated the use of yellow paint in video games. Just as exploding barrels are red and poison gasses are green, yellow is commonly used in games as shorthand for “these are handholds that you can climb.” The current round of yellow paint debate started a few days ago when Twitter user The Oshborn posted a screenshot from Final Fantasy 7 with the caption, “THE YELLOW PAINT VIRUS HAS INFECTED FF7,” but the debate is nothing new. As far back as 2013, the developers of The Last of Us were widely criticized for their use of yellow to indicate handholds. Whether this is useful visual shorthand that serves players or an example of game developers being lazy depends on your point of view, but one thing is for sure: once you have a job, you will not care about this debate at all.

What is “coworker core?”

Coworker core is the name some young people online have come up with for content that a coworker might share because they think it’s funny—basically, cringey and pedestrian shares like old Family Guy clips or Seinfeld memes. The lesson: if you work with anyone under the age of 25 and share anything that you think is funny, the joke is probably on you. But don't despair, as this is part of the great circle of life. Members of generation Alpha have already started making fun of Gen Z for being geriatric because they can't appreciate Skibidi Toilet videos. Besides, you drive a much nicer car than your younger coworkers and don't have student loans to pay off, so who's laughing now, punk?

Why are “legging legs” banned from TikTok?

First, the definition: legging legs refers to people with the “right” kind of legs to wear leggings. When the debate began a few months ago, many TikTok users pointed out that anyone can wear leggings because they're clothes and they make them in many sizes, but others of a more body-police mindset maintained that the only people who should wear leggings have skinny legs and a thigh gap. Because it’s gross and TikTok is for kids, the company banned the phrase “legging legs” from its platform. A search for the term Legging Legs on TikTok leads to a phone number for the National Alliance for Eating Disorders.

What People Are Getting Wrong This Week: Taylor Swift Conspiracy Theories

If there were a Billboard chart for most lied-about celebrity, singer Taylor Swift would be number one. Her unprecedented level of fame has led to legions of wackjobs and online cranks making up all kinds of weird stuff about her. Everyone has probably heard the NFL-is-fixed theory by now, but there's so many more, so let's take a trip down the Swiftian rabbit hole and dig up some of the strangest conspiracy theories about everyone's favorite singe-slash-intelligence agent-slash-spy novelist-slash-Nazi-slash-satanic clone.

Taylor Swift is part of a government-back mass psy-ops campaign

The Taylor theory du-jour contends that Swift is a key player in a Pentagon-led psychological operation aimed at getting Joe Biden reelected president in 2024. The plan required employing Swift as a government agent, engineering a fake romantic relationship between Swift and Kansas City Chiefs’ tight end Travis Kelce, then convincing the NFL to fix the 2023-2024 football season to ensure a Chiefs Super Bowl appearance. It all came together beautifully, and will end on Sunday with Taylor Swift appearing at halftime of the big game to endorse Joe Biden.

This kind of froth-mouthed fever dream used to be distributed through leaflets left at bus stations, but we've gone so far around the bend that prominent people like Fox New’s Jesse Watters and failed Republican presidential candidate Vivek Ramaswamy have endorsed and amplified parts of the narrative, prompting the actual Pentagon to respond. "Listen, you nit-wits, Taylor Swift is just some singer. Stop being so weird," Pentagon spokesperson Sabrina Singh did not exactly tell Politico. "I mean, fuck, look at you people. Jesus," they did not add.

Taylor Swift is a novelist who writes under the name "Elly Conway”

Officially, Elly Conway is a young author whose debut spy novel was adapted to the screen in the movie Argylle. But Conway’s social media footprint is suspiciously light. A first-time novelist’s unpublished book inspiring at $200 million film deal is suspicious. More suspiciously, there are no known photos of Conway, and her official biography is two lines long. This all led to the theory that Taylor Swift is actually the Conway. The evidence: the fictional character of “Elly Conway” in the Argylle movie looks and acts a little like Swift and has the same type of cat.

This week, it was revealed that there never was an Elly Conway; It was just movie biz marketing all along. There was no spy novel. The only Argylle book is the one based on the movie, not the other way around, and it was written by Terry Hayes and Tammy Cohen, both established authors. Taylor Swift had nothing to do with any of this. Also: Argylle is getting bad reviews.

Taylor Swift is dating Travis Kelce for his money

This tweet from alfalfa male Nick Adams sums up another Swift/Kelce conspiracy theory:

Tweet from Nick Adams
Credit: Nick Adams - Twitter

Swift, a literal billionaire, has not commented on the rumor.

Taylor Swift is secretly gay/bi

NFL conspiracy-theorist are almost all non-Swift fans, but one of the most persistent rumors about the singer comes from within her own fandom. They call themselves “Gaylors," and they think that Swift is gay or bi. Despite her much-discussed relationships with various gentlemen and her public statements to the contrary, Gaylors think Swift reveals the real truth about her sexuality only through the coded messages she leaves in her songs and videos. Because she's a fan of The Riddler.

Taylor Swift is a Nazi

Back in 2016, before Swift publicly endorsed LGBT rights and vowed to take down Donald Trump in 2020, some members of the alt-right enjoyed online role-playing games that involved pretending Taylor Swift was secretly a Nazi.

"Taylor Swift is a pure Aryan goddess, like something out of classical Greek poetry. Athena reborn,” Andre Anglin, a huge nerd, wrote on incel website The Daily Stormer. He went on: “Taylor Swift is secretly a Nazi and is simply waiting for the time when Donald Trump makes it safe for her to come out and announce her Aryan agenda to the world.” 

Taylor Swift is a Satan-worshipping clone

Taylor Swift and Zeena Schreck
Credit: Lara Diaz - Medium

Taylor Swift bears a passing resemblance to Zeena Schreck, the daughter of Church of Satan founder Anton LaVey, leading to the reasonable, normal belief that they are the same person. “But, Steve,” you might be saying, “Schreck was the high priestess of the Church of Satan from 1985 to 1990, and Swift wasn’t born until 1989, so how could it be?" Well, genius, it can be, because Taylor Swift is a clone.

Swift is but one of a number of Schreck copies that were created around 1990 to spread the word of Satan across the earth. Swift has left clues pointing to this dark fact in her videos, like there's a pyramid in one, for instance. And they do look a bit alike, so there's no denying it. Case closed.

Taylor Swift was on 4Chan

Back in 2013, a theory spread on 4Chan that one of the site's users was actually Taylor Swift. A lot of screenshots and evidence was either uncovered or manufactured to prove that an anonymous 4Channer was actually Tay-Tay. The most telling: Someone on the site claimed to be a famous entertainer. This one could actually be true though. This theory is at least possible: Swift was 23 at the time, and a lot of 23-year-olds are on 4Chan. You can also see how posting somewhere anonymously might appeal to someone as famous as Swift. None of this is evidence, of course, and there’s ultimately no way of knowing if it's true—it’s not like 4Chan users have any credibility. But I want it to be true. Anyway, if you want to dig into this nonsense further, you can start with this YouTube video from Whang

The Out-of-Touch Adults' Guide to Kid Culture: What is 'Hurkle-Durkling'?

This week's dive into the ocean of youth culture has turned up mostly mysteries. Why are young people using AI to put clothes on women? Why are kids throwing slushies at their own pick-up trucks? How does one "hurkle-durkle?" Most importantly: Why are videos of people getting in trouble for wearing big boots so hilarious?

#DignifAI using AI to add clothing

It was appalling when the cretins of the internet started using artificial intelligence to create porn of people who don’t want porn made of them, but the newest trend from the darkest-and-dorkiest corner of the internet, 4chan, is using AI to “fix” images of provocatively dressed people (almost always women) to cover them up. They're adding more “modest” clothing, erasing tattoos, and otherwise “dignifying” women whose style of dress is not approved of. The Twitter account @dignifai is dedicated to creating and spreading images like this:

AI altered image of Miley Cyrus
Credit: @DignifAI/X

The practice seems partly like a snotty response to the AI deep fakes of Taylor Swift that came out recently on Twitter, but as usual, the point has been missed. It’s not OK to clothe people who didn’t consent to appear clothed just like it's not OK to undress people who didn't agree to that. Women can't win. If they choose to dress modestly, they'll be shamed and ridiculed and their images will be manipulated to remove their clothes. If they choose to dress provocatively, they'll be shamed and ridiculed and their image will be manipulated to make them "dignified."

Why are videos of people getting in trouble for wearing big boots funny?

AI isn't being used exclusively for evil, though. There’s a counter-balancing force embodied by the TikTok account of bluweesh, who collects AI-generated videos of people getting in trouble for wearing big boots. It can’t be explained. It must be seen. I’m not sure this kind of absurdist humor actually balances the moral scales, but it’s still the best use for AI generated video I’ve seen yet.

What is hurkle-durkling?

The newest trend on TikTok is extolling the benefits of hurkle-durkle. Hurkle-durkling is lounging in bed past the time you should get up. You might know it as “bed-rotting” or practicing self-care. It differs from “being lazy” or “crippling depression” in that hurkle-durkling is a conscious decision to reject the demands that life places on us, at least for a few hours. 

The phrase caught on when actress/singer Kira Kosarin used it on her TikTok. Kosarin said the word is Scottish, and she’s right. "Hurkle" first appeared in John Jamieson's Etymological Dictionary of the Scottish Language in 1808 with the definition, “to draw the body together." At some point, someone added rhyming slang, and we ended up with the kind of nonsense-sounding phrase that gets popular on social media. I'm a longtime fan of the practice, and I'm glad it's catching on.

Boomer profile pics

I usually look into the lives and habits of younger people, but I thought I'd to turn the glass backwards and see what younger people see when they look at us olds. Not surprisingly, they mostly see how lame we are; specifically, how lame our profile pictures are

Younger people have noticed that Boomers (and Gen X, let’s be honest) almost always post profile pics in their cars, with sunglasses on, usually with beards. This look was once thought to represent Trump voters, but it’s really a generational thing that crosses political lines.

According to one widely accepted theory originally posted on Reddit, "sunglasses create an emotional distance between the subject and their action.” According to this theorist, the cars-and-shades thing is an attempt to look cool, and "one of the ways in which they ‘look cool’ is the toughness that comes from not caring about other people.” 

That’s an interesting theory, but here's a more reasonable explanation: We wear sunglasses and beards in our profile pictures because they cover up one's face, and our faces are fucking disaster areas. 

TikTokers throwing slushies at their own trucks

We might look lame in our profile pictures, but a growing trend among kids is throwing slushies at their own trucks, so who’s the lame now? Videos of people walking out of convenience stores with extra-large slushies, then hurling them at their own windshield are going viral across TikTok. They're actually pretty great. Check out the examples at the page for “Bag Season” by Jay Lewis, the preferred soundtrack for slushy videos. Here’s (apparently) the first one, a bare-bones imitation, a parody, someone who doesn’t approve, and someone taking it too far. Like the Big Boots trend, there's no obvious rhyme nor reason to self-slushies, other than it being a good way to show off one’s lifted pick-up (or Bubba Truck) and it’s funny. I fully approve of this trend.

Viral video of the week: Apple Vision Pro and Cybertruck

Instagram user Supercar Ron originally posted this week’s viral video. It captures a guy behind the wheel of a Cybertruck using an Apple Vision Pro as he tools down the highway. Is this a vision of the future or is the driver just a gigantic nerd? Or is something else going on?

The video was re-posted on Twitter, where over 17 million people viewed it in its first few days online, with many leaving comments about the dark path that humanity is on, or just generally saying “ha ha.” But some users called shenanigans, pointing out that the Cybertruck doesn’t have a self-driving feature yet. Supercar Ron agreed, and clarified that the video is part of a skit, self-driving wasn’t activated, and the Apple Vision Pro headset wasn’t displaying anything when the footage was shot.

As much as self-driving fills me with white-knuckle terror, I think a self-driving car piloted by a goof in a VR headset is safer than a driver who is texting or a driver who is drunk, and we’ve accepted that those people are on the highway all the time. 

18 of the Best ‘Smooth Brain’ TV Shows to Binge Mindlessly

When it comes to streaming television, desperately uncool is the new cool. While the hip crowd is buzzing about the new season of True Detective, most of the biggest streaming shows represent something other than what we typically think of as prestige TV: It's lawyer shows, police procedurals, and medical dramas all the way down.

Everybody's watching this stuff, including, or especially, Gen-Z teens and twentysomethings who you'd expect to be watching The Bear and White Lotus. Instead (or, at least,additionally) they're watching Suits, a show that was on for a long time, got indifferent reviews from critics, and was never trending on social media.

I have a theory as to why. Attention-grabbing Prestige TV tends to be challenging and complex. Following multiple shows with extended ensemble casts and labyrinthine plots can be too much amid an already overpacked media diet. Having a more traditional episodic structure doesn't necessarily make a show bad or dumb...but it can make it a lot easier to watch—all the better if there are a ton of episodes, inviting you to turn watching them into a comforting routine. In an era of grim dramas with "cinematic" production values, these shows also tend to be brighter (literally), with more easily distinguishable dialogue, which means you maybe don't need to look up as often from whatever you're doing while you watch them (I'm a big fan of folding laundry).

Here are 18 not necessarily mindless shows you can mindlessly binge whenever you need a break.


Call the Midwife (2012 – )

This British period drama (it kicks off in 1957) takes place in and around Poplar, London, then one of the city's most desperately poor districts. As the National Health Service is born, secular trained midwives team up with the nuns of Nonnatus House, a nursing convent that had been in the business of providing medical care to the area's poor for decades. Now in its 13th season, the series has long since burned through the memoirs on which it was initially based, but still draws big audiences with its genuinely moving stories of birth and death. Call the Midwife very often deals frankly with issues of women's health that other shows are still too timid to broach, but the appeal here is, I think, in its episodic format: continuing storylines and character arcs take a backseat to narratives that are resolved—for better or worse—in the course of an episode, with narrator Vanessa Redgrave putting a neat cap on things.

Where to stream: Netflix, PBS


Suits (2011 – 2019)

When Suits left the air after an impressive nine seasons in 2019, you could have been forgiven for believing that the USA show's biggest contribution to the dialogue was the presence of Megan Markle—but, here we are, four years later, and Suits is a top streaming show, with nearly 60 billion minutes viewed in 2023. It feels like a safer, soapier alternative to something like Succession, the kind of drama with legal overtones that requires far less emotional investment.

Where to stream: Netflix, Peacock


Equalizer (2021 – )

The Queen Latifah-led Equalizer reboots the 1980s series (and sidesteps the Denzel Washington movies) by spinning the premise in a slightly different direction: Latifah plays single-mom Robyn McCall, an impossibly skilled former CIA operative who puts her talents to work for those in need. While the original's vibe was more about the cops being handcuffed by things like "rules" and "giving perps their basic human dignity," this one is more about those who've been failed by systems that don't care about them—and who might benefit from the help of a woman who can beat just about anyone's ass. There's action, violence, and sometimes dramatic stakes, but stories mostly resolve themselves by the end of a given week's episode, and it's typically very satisfying watching Robyn and company spy and/or punch their way out of sticky situations to help the oppressed.

Where to stream: Paramount+


Grey's Anatomy (2005 – )

It's not quite the longest-running drama on TV, but at 19 seasons (and counting), this series that began in the George W. Bush administration is still doing just fine in the ratings...but the reruns are where it's at. Old episodes of the show have topped streaming charts for several years running, with an appeal that's nicely splits the difference between traditional comfort TV and serialization: the show offers up some of the case-of-the-week drama that's been the bread-and-butter of medical dramas for decades, but also the type of genuinely juicy soap opera storylines that creator Shonda Rhimes quickly proved herself a master of.

Where to stream: Netflix, Hulu


All Creatures Great and Small (2020 – )

An update of a venerable British franchise, itself based on a series of autobiographical novels from writer James Alfred Wight (aka James Herriot), All Creatures takes us back to the rural Yorkshire Dales of the 1930s, with a Scottish vet moving to the small farming town of Darrowby to take up a job as a veterinary assistant. It takes a bit of a willingness to see animals in jeopardy on a weekly basis, but the big-hearted show only rarely goes for a gut punch. Mostly, it's charming domestic drama amid a bucolic landscape, with frequent guest appearances by baby cows.

Where to stream: PBS


Quantum Leap (2022 – )

The joy of the Quantum Leap (a continuation, though with mostly new characters, of the original) is in the anthology format. Like any modern show, there are running character and plot arcs, but the relatively simple sci-fi premise sees time-traveler Ben Song (Raymond Lee) live the life of a new character each week, for just long enough to help "put right what once went wrong." The individual stories play like well-written mini-movies, sometimes with very real stakes, and the narratives pretty much always wrap up by hour's end, meaning that the drama doesn't (much) carry over from week to week. Plus, it's got Ernie Hudson...always a soothing presence.

Where to stream: Peacock (original and revival)


NCIS (2003 – )

Moving up the list of longest-running dramas, NCIS clocks in at an impressive 20 seasons (and counting), with the added prestige of having birthed five (and counting!) spin-offs. It's that kind of volume that has helped the show become a top-five acquired streaming series, with literally hundreds of hours for people to sift through. Starring Mark Harmon for most of its run (he left at the end of season 19), the show involves fictional agents of the title's Naval Criminal Investigative Service, as they deal with Navy-related crimes. Specific, sure, but the show blends police procedural stuff (popular) with military drama (also popular), and keeps a pretty light touch through it all.

Where to stream: Paramount+ (all current seasons), Netflix (all but the most recent seasons)


Gilmore Girls (2000 – 2007, 2016)

Gilmore Girls did reasonably well during its initial seven-season run, but largely because it became a flagship show (alongside Buffy The Vampire Slayer) for itty-bitty, and now defunct, network The WB. It's impossible to know how well the (mostly) smart and funny series would have fared on a major channel—but it's currently a top streaming show. None of that has anything to do with its undeniable quality (at least until a change of network and show runners lead to a rocky final season). As with most of these shows, this one is a good reminder that smooth-brain TV doesn't ever need to be dumb. Lorelai and Rory Gilmore are just fun to spend time with.

Where to stream: Netflix


Star Trek: The Next Generation (1987 – 1994)

Onboard a starship that looks and feels like a luxury hotel, we take a journey across the universe with a crew of smart, competent, likable people who mostly all get along. If we don't want to live on the U.S.S. Enterprise (1701-D, of course), then I certainly wouldn't mind working there—well, except for the "nearly getting destroyed every few weeks" thing. But that's all part of the fun. Star Trek: Voyager also fits the bill for a comfort watch, with Deep Space Nine serving as a more challenging, serialized next step.

Where to stream: Paramount+


Full House (1987 – 1995)

Whatever happened to predictability? The eight-season TGIF (ask your parents) staple was beloved enough that it was reborn in 2016 with a Netflix series that was itself one of the most popular sitcoms streaming—and thereby kicking off a wave of sitcom revivals, with mixed results. Still, the revival (2016 – 2020) succeeded in much the same way that the original did; both series promise pure silly sitcom fun, with just enough relationship drama to keep things moving. It's easy to understand why viewers old and young have been drawn to the brightly colored world of Danny, D.J., Jesse, and the rest of the gang.

Where to stream: Max, Hulu, Vudu, Apple TV+, Prime Video (original), Netflix (revival)


The West Wing (1999 – 2006)

The Martin Sheen-lead show was certainly popular during its initial run, but its ripped-from-the-headlines style gave it an edge, even as it allowed us to imagine smart, thoughtful people getting jobs in government. Seeing reasonably intelligent people talking through the challenges of politics and the nation's problems on a weekly basis has always been a bit of a balm, never more so than at this moment—the show's concluding seasons involve an electoral contest between relatively reasonable Republican Alan Alda and relatively reasonable Democrat Jimmy Smits. Imagine! The show's world can be a little frustrating when contrasted against our more explicitly appalling one, but it's a thoroughly pleasing fantasy nonetheless.

Where to stream: Max


That's So Raven (2003 – 2007)

Though it only ran for four seasons, Raven Symoné's Disney Channel teen sitcom has had one of the longest reaches of any of those shows—spin-off Cory in the House did OK for a couple of seasons back in the aughts, and modern revival Raven's Home has been running since 2017. The original series focused on the high-school antics of the title's Raven, whose secret psychic powers complicate the already challenging experience that is high school. The followup sees her raising a couple of kids as a single mother, with a focus on both Raven and the new generation of teens.

Where to stream: Disney+, Hulu (original), Disney+ (revival)


Buffy the Vampire Slayer (1997 – 2003)

There was plenty of drama during Buffy's initial run, with plot twists that left us laughing as often as we were crying. But even the most emotional television can become comfort food given time and exposure—and knowing the twists and turns, deaths and dismemberments in advance allows us to chill out a bit and enjoy the show's unique blend of humor, action, and high school drama. Even given the show's final twist—the fact that its once-beloved creator turned out to be an enormous jerk—it's still surprisingly soothing to revisit Sunnydale. I keep waiting for Gen-Z to discover this one and plaster it all over TikTok.

Where to stream: Hulu


The Golden Girls (1985 – 1992)

One of the smartest sitcoms of the 1980s is, again, a reminder that comfort TV can still be as snappy as a smartass retired dame. Fans (raising both my hands here) have seen episodes of the series so many times they've memorized them, meaning that it's easy to put the show on in the background while we're doing other stuff. Time may have taken some of the edge off of the girls' banter, but the show is remains as cool as it ever was, even if its age and classic sitcom trappings would make you think otherwise.

Where to stream: Hulu


When Calls the Heart (2014 – )

Another show wherein the beauty lies in getting what's promised: the Hallmark series, beginning in 1910, follows young teacher Elizabeth Thatcher (Erin Krakow) as she leaves her relatively wealthy family to take a job in a rural Canadian mining town. There's romance, drama, and triumph among the woman-led cast of characters, with the gentle tone and big heart that you might expect, given the title.

Where to stream: Peacock


Living Single (1993 – 1998)

One of the best and most underrated sitcoms of the 1990s (surely having nothing to do with its all-black cast), Living Single stars Queen Latifah, Kim Coles, Kim Fields, and Erika Alexander as four friends navigating the single life in New York City. It plays off some of the same dynamics that worked for a show like The Golden Girls before it (i.e., four women with distinct personalities), and certainly served as inspiration for shows that came after (including Friends). Living Single adds to the comedy (and silliness) some still relevant social issues, and serialized relationship drama that never brings things down, even as it makes the show a solid binge watch. Revival when?

Where to stream: Max, Hulu


Law & Order: Special Victims Unit (1999 – )

If you had told me back in 1999 that one of the longest-running dramas ever would revolve around particularly heinous and disturbing sex crimes, and that it would even become something of a binge/comfort watch...well, I wouldn't have put money on the proposition. But buoyed by an engaging cast (Mariska Hargitay and, for much of its run, Christopher Meloni and Richard Belzer), the show does what all of the best police dramas do: offer the comfort of knowing that, in a world full of horrific crimes, there are conscientious people working to close cases and get the worst offenders off the streets.

Where to stream: Hulu, Peacock


Murder, She Wrote (1984 – 1996)

The coziest of cozy murder shows, Murder, She Wrote found the charming and eminently practical novelist Jessica Fletcher (Angela Lansbury) somehow being on the site of a brutal murder every week for 12 seasons. Not suspicious at all. The show makes murder look fun, with a light touch, a sense of humor, and a supporting cast of charming eccentrics living in Jessica's bucolic hometown of Cabot Cove, who stuck around to liven things up when Jessica wasn't traveling and meeting an array of celebrity guest stars, Love Boat-style. It's a fun binge watch but, if Jessica Fletcher rolls into your town, get the hell out of there.

Where to stream: Peacock

What People Are Getting Wrong This Week: The TikTok Fugitive

Chad Hower, aka "The TikTok Fugitive" has a hell of a story to tell. He says both the the FBI and Interpol have been trying to extradite him to the U.S. for the past 16 years to face charges for a crime he did not commit. In hundreds of TikTok videos posted from Russia, St. Kitts and other nations, Hower taunts the authorities and explains the Byzantine details of how an innocent Microsoft computer programmer wound up an international criminal. Hower's plight gained the attention and sympathy of some of the biggest influencers on TikTok, and his videos have been viewed over 120 million times on the platform. But is he telling the truth?

Hower's story begins with a bitter divorce. He says his ex-wife falsely accused him of kidnapping his son, even though he had full legal custody of the child at the time. The FBI got involved, and an innocent trip to Europe turned into a stint in a Bulgarian prison and a life on the run.

Hower says the U.S. has tried to extradite him at least three times, from at least one nation with an extradition agreement, but they haven't succeeded because the charges against him are bogus on their face. The FBI, according to Hower, knows he's innocent, but refuses to end the manhunt. Even though his child is an adult now, and even though he has court documents he says prove his innocence in indisputable terms, Hower is still forced to live as an exile and fight to clear his name.

Hower says sympathetic journalists who tried to cover the story were scared off by the FBI, leaving no choice but to take his story directly to the people through TikTok, podcasts, online interviews, and petitions. If you search Hower's name, you'll be greeted with pages of sources discussing and amplifying his story and the injustice that's been done to him, but few sources that critically examine his claims.

Anyone can say anything on the Internet, but Hower really is wanted by the FBI. He really is a fugitive who has been given asylum in Russia, and really has had his extradition fail. But when you pull on any other string of this complicated ball of yarn, it seems to unravel into an uglier story where the villain is not the FBI.

Is Hower an angry divorced guy?

According to The National Center for Missing and Exploited Children, in the U.S., about 200,000 children are abducted every year by a parent or other family member. Most of the aggrieved parents who lift their children from court-ordered visitation don't end up as international criminals, but this may have been the fate that Hower brought upon himself through his uncommon personal stubbornness and intelligence.

I'm not going to get into the legal nitty-gritty, but the evidence suggests that Hower is not being entirely honest about everything, to put it charitably. If you're interested in specifics, check out this exhaustively researched and excellent video from YouTube's CHUPPL, who carefully examines many of Hower's claims (and also delves into Hower's habit of eating locusts, his self-documented road rage, and his hobby of cosplaying as Gru from Minions.) CHUPPL's conclusion: The best evidence indicates the legal case at the center of this whole mess was handled by the books, despite Hower's increasingly complex conspiracy theories.

Broadly, Hower's documents about the initial kidnapping seem to only indicate he's innocent if you ignore other documents, court orders, and laws—it was a very complex custody case involving the state courts of Tennessee and Pennsylvania and eventually the Federal court. It's the same with the extraditions: A more reasonable explanation for a failed extradition would be a lack of dual criminality. If Bulgaria doesn't have a law against this kind of kidnapping, they wouldn't extradite, no matter what information is presented to them.

Then there are the vibes.

The importance of a working bullshit meter

Within a minute of watching my first Hower video, I was skeptical—dude's making some extraordinary claims—and from there, every new detail made the story seem less credible instead of more. I can't speak definitely about the factual debunk without devoting my life to exploring it, but the story doesn't pass my personal smell test.

There's no plausible explanation of why the FBI would waste so much time and effort pursuing a relatively unimportant man that they know is innocent, leading to the suggestion that the CIA could be involved because they wanted to recruit Hower for the agency—another hard-to-swallow pill. (Free tip: When anyone mentions the CIA to cover a hole in their story, you can stop listening; 99 times out of 100, they're lying to you.) Then there's the suggestion that "mainstream" journalists were scared off the story by the FBI. A more reasonable possibility: Credible journalists showed interest, did some research, clocked the guy as a fake, and stopped returning his calls.

But most of all, Hower has a "this guy is so full of shit" feeling that I can't explain rationally. He seems like an intelligent, driven, bizarre person with an axe to grind and a lot of time to hone it to a sharp edge. Maybe he's motivated by righteous anger based on legitimate injustice from the court system, but his many half-truths and fanciful explanations feel intentionally crafted to influence people. It's hard for me not to see something sinister there. He's clearly a smart enough person to know he's presenting one side of a complex story and calling it the whole truth (at best), and it's troubling that so many people can't see through it.

The Out-of-Touch Adults' Guide to Kid Culture: What is 'Palworld?'

If the gamer in your life is suddenly locked into Palworld and you want to know what's up, read on. The upstart game is causing some controversy with Nintendo, but it's not the only dust-up in youth culture this week. There's also the feud between Nicki Minaj and Megan Thee Stallion, a South Korean cosmetic surgeon vs. TikTok, and 4chan's perpetual battle against all that is good and pure in the world. Even this week's viral video, a song from Hazbin Hotel, isn't free of conflict.

What is Palworld (and why does it make Nintendo mad?)

Palworld is an open-world monster collecting and crafting game that has taken off in popularity very quickly. Published by Pocket Pair, Palworld was released on Jan. 19, and has already sold six million copies. It’s on the top of Steam’s charts for concurrent players. Powerhouse Twitch streamers like IronMouse are streaming Palworld. These are Fortnite and Minecraft numbers: Palworld is a phenomenon already, and it’s less than a week old.

In Palworld, players can choose to live peacefully among the world's many creatures (known as Pals), or they can kill them and eat them—just like real animals! You can also train your Pals to work in factories and on farms, and you might find yourself forced to consume your beloved Pals in order to survive. You capture Pals in a ball, and you can train them to fight against the Pals of other collectors, leading some to describe the game as “Pokémon with guns.” That’s where the controversy comes in. The possibly actionable similarity between Nintendo’s property and Palworld prompted Nintendo to release a statement saying it intends to “investigate and take appropriate measures to address any acts that infringe on intellectual property rights related to the Pokémon.” Bottom line: If you’re curious about Palworld, don’t put off giving it a go; it might not be around forever.

The Nicki Minaj vs. Megan Thee Stallion feud, explained

A feud of epic proportion is raging between rappers Nicki Minaj and Megan Thee Stallion this week. The static started last week when Stallion, best known for her hit “Savage,” released “Hiss,” a new single that takes aim at a wide variety of haters and under-appreciators. Stallion doesn’t mention Nicki by name, but the lines, “These hoes don't be mad at Megan, these hoes mad at Megan's Law" seem like a dig at Minaj. They are a reference to the national sex offender registry; Minaj’s husband, Kenneth Petty, is on the registry for a crime he committed in the 1990s, and he recently spent a year on house arrest for failing to register after moving to California. That seems to be the immediate cause, but like all wars, the real basis seems to be long-simmering tension between two would-be queens of hip-hop—town’s just not big enough for both of ‘em.

Minaj, best known for “Anaconda,” responded by getting epicly-mad on X (formerly Twitter), posting a deluge of disses over the course of half a week. It culminated in a full battle-rap from Minaj, “Big Foot.” Judging from the comments, Stallion is coming off better and it’s not a close contest. YouTube commenters are calling attention to Minaj’s outsized reaction as opposed to posting things like, “cracking good diss track! Good on you!” To be fair, Minaj put the track out quick. Anyway, feel free to listen to both and pick your favorite if you’re bored or something. 

Megan Thee Stallion's "Hiss"

Nicki Minaj's"Big Foot"

Why is Dr. Kim causing a commotion on TikTok?

Dr. Kim is a South Korean plastic surgeon who who seems to specialize in facelifts and eye-lifts and is going viral on TikTok this week, with commenters sharing the vids he posts and commenting on the appearance of his patients. Along with rando TikTokers, Dr. Kim has started drawing commentary from other online plastic surgeons, who are dropping diss videos that go as hard as Nicki Minaj and Megan Thee Stallion. (OK, maybe that's an overstatement: They’re just saying things like, “Every surgeon has to make their own decision as to what’s right, and for me: no thank you.”)

Based on comments, Dr. Kim’s patients look shockingly ironed and processed to people on TikTok and X. But who are they to judge? South Korean people seem to have a different standards for what’s attractive than we have in the west—both the “eye smile” procedure and surgery meant to result in smaller, V-shaped faces are common in South Korean plastic surgery circles, but are rarely practiced in the U.S. By contrast, people in the U.S. have more breast augmentations done than they do in South Korea. I don't understand giving people any flack for whatever plastic surgery they want, as long as the patients are happy with the result. In fact, I hope it goes further, and people start giving themselves extra noses or pyramid-shaped heads. Let's get weird with this shit, right?

New slang: what does “41% yourself” and “WPS” mean?

The controversy continues with a couple of very-online slang terms. The first, “41% yourself,” originated on putrid nightmare-chamber 4chan. "41% Yourself" is a way for online cretins to say “kill yourself” and make it even worse by referencing a 2014 National Transgender Discrimination Survey that indicated that 41% of respondents had attempted suicide. (People were a bad idea.)

The second term, “WPS,” means “white people shit” and it's more tongue-in-cheek. It refers to things white people are into, like really enjoying TED Talks or listening to Queen. The term has been around for a while, but it’s enjoying a resurgence in 2024 on TikTok, largely due to a video of a couple who don’t wear shoes, even in winter. These people really earned the three-letter descriptor. 

Viral video of the week: "Hell’s Greatest Dad"

This week’s viral video is a clip of a song from Prime's new series Hazbin Hotel. The cartoon features voice acting from Broadway heavyweights like Leslie Rodriguez Kritzer, Krystina Alabado, and Lilli Cooper, paired with the work of straight-from-the-internet writers and animators headed by Vivienne Medrano. Hazbin’s show-tune inspired music is excellent, and it’s gratifying that it seems to be finding an audience so quickly—the clip of “Hell’s Greatest Dad” has been shared nearly five million times in its first three days and is accompanied by the kinds of comments only a passionate fandom leaves behind. It wouldn’t be a passionate fandom if people weren’t pissed about something, though. Some Hazbin fans are not happy that the entire voice cast from the original, YouTube pilot was replaced. No official reason for the recasting has been given, but if I had to guess, I’d say it’s because the new cast is way better. 

What People Are Getting Wrong This Week: Is Tom Hanks Evil?

When I'm checking the internet for PEOPLE WHO ARE WRONG ABOUT THINGS, a few names frequently appear attached to misinformation. There are the expected political figures—Clinton, Trump, Biden, George Soros—but there's also Tom Hanks.

The most recent example of Hanks-hate that's gaining traction is this post from Twitter (that I saw on Snopes). The doctored image of Hanks has been viewed over 2.5 million times since it was posted just yesterday. It's not even a particularly inflammatory image, just Hanks in an anti-Trump t-shirt, but something about the actor makes a lot of people so angry that they have to invent things that he did to be angry about. Here are some recent examples:

I could go on, but you get the point—there's a definite hate-boner for the guy. But why him, of all people? I think of Tom Hanks as the likable star of Forrest Gump, Castaway, and Mazes and Monsters; an amusing guest on talk shows, a little annoyingly bland, but generally a friendly seeming actor-guy. How is it that others believe that Tom Hanks is not just capable of, but guilty of monumental acts of evil, a shady international super-criminal setting deadly wildfires between molestation vacations to Epstein's Island?

The history of Tom Hanks hate

Hanks has never been a favorite of the Right. Conservatives dragged the guy even in the Times-Before-Trump. For example, in 2010, Hanks was called an ignoramus for suggesting a similarity between racism against the Japanese in World War II and then-current nationalism. There are other examples of "I take issue with that remark" responses to him, but no real vitriol. It's the kind of stock response conservatives used to have for any member of the Hollywood elite—low stakes culture wars shit that seems quaint these days. But in 2018, Hanks went from being scoffed at as typical Hollywood Liberal to public enemy number one among the dumbest people you went to high school with, and the mouth-frothing rage largely originated with one man: actor Isaac Kappy.

Who was Isaac Kappy?

Kappy was a strictly D-list actor with credits limited to characters that are not given names in screenplays. He was "Rowdy Prisoner" in Breaking Bad and "Pet Store Clerk" in Thor, but that was enough to get him a spot as a guest on Alex Jones' show in 2018. On his appearance, Kappy detailed a vast child molestation conspiracy in Hollywood that he said he'd witnessed firsthand. Even Jones seemed incredulous, but the appearance brought Kappy a level of stardom within the fetid Right Wing lunatic swamp that far eclipsed anything he'd achieved on planet earth. His medium was Periscope, and to keep the people's attention focused on him, Kappy started naming people he said were involved in Hollywood's massive molestation ring, including Hanks. The rest of the names were of celebrities openly critical of Donald Trump. (What a coincidence!) Kappy offered no evidence for his claims of course, because there wasn't any, and Kappy was, almost certainly, mentally ill.

Leaving behind a note on Instagram claiming he was the reincarnation of Judas Iscariot, Kappy died by suicide in 2019 by leaping off a highway overpass in Arizona, but the dark legacy of the troubled actor lived on.

Once Hanks' name was out there, and Kappy's suicide was re-cast as a deep-state hit job, Q-Anon and associated cretins signal-boosted accusations against Hanks on anonymous 4Chan posts, Periscope videos, and every other avenue accepting of the "valuable free speech" of the stupid. Repetition becomes truth among the easily led, and Hanks' name has been attached to so many evil deeds that a response of "That seems like something Tom Hanks would do," is expected from a certain segment of the population. And it goes on to this day. Which is why members of the current safe-space-dummies, Twitter, are spreading doctored images of Tom Hanks to great engagement.

(I'm going to take a shower now.)

What People Are Getting Wrong This Week: Trump's Iowa Victory

This Monday, former president Donald Trump took the first concrete step toward winning the Republican Party's nomination for the the 2024 election. To few people's surprise, Trump handily beat competitors Nikki Haley and Ron DeSantis, winning 50% of Iowa's voters. CNN called it a "stunning show of strength." The Associated Press called it a "record victory." But there's another side to the story—a counter-narrative that categorizes Trump as having just barely squeaked by.

In a tweet that's been seen over 370,000 times, political activist Victor Shi asked: "Can the media please stop saying tonight was a 'win' for Donald Trump? Trump’s margin of victory was the smallest of any Republican candidate in American history, half of caucus goers voted against him."

To further flesh out the argument: Trump received 57,000 votes, only about 7% of the total Republican party in Iowa. "Where's the enthusiasm?" people are asking.

Sadly (depending on your views) the mainstream media's read seems much closer to reality. I'm not sure how Shi got the idea that Trump's margin is the smallest in history. The opposite is actually true: Trump's Iowa win was the largest percentage victory in the history of Republican primaries. Whether the turnout portends trouble for Trump requires divining voter's views and motivations based on little evidence, but there is a hazy, non-number factor that (probably) helps explain the low turnout in Iowa: It was really freakin' cold.

Weather: decider of elections

It was extremely cold and snowy in Iowa on the night of the caucus, and inclement weather always lowers voter turnout. We can't know which candidates' supporters would have been more likely to have avoided the caucus for snow reasons, but I'd put my money on Trump's. In a race where all the polls have indicated that Trump would win in a walk for literally years, it seems reasonable that his supporters would skip the caucuses: He's a shoo-in, after all. Rabid Ron DeSantis fans or Nikki Haley-heads, on the other hand, seem more likely to be motivated to get out there to support their underdog candidate.

A total of 110,000 voters turned out in Iowa in 2024, compared to 187,000 GOP voters in 2016. These were the least attended primary caucuses in a decade. Whether this is evidence of an overall "enthusiasm gap" can't be determined, but I think it's safer to think Republicans are secure that Trump is going to take the nomination so didn't bother freezing themselves.

Election wishcasting

The alternative take on Trump's victory looks a lot like wishcasting: "The act of interpreting information or a situation in a way that casts it as favorable or desired, despite the fact that there is no evidence for such a conclusion." Expect to see a lot more of this as the election approaches.

The silver lining, if you don't like Trump, is that Iowa is a tiny state, and whom it chooses for the Republican (or Democratic) nomination doesn't actually matter in the general election. Pete Buttigieg's victory in Iowa in 2020 didn't catapult him to the nomination. It went to the fourth place finisher instead.

Unlike Mayor Pete, Trump is almost certain to win the overall nomination in 2024. But his popularity in Iowa doesn't say much about how he'll do against Biden. Around 90% of Iowa's 3.18M residents are white, compared to about 70% in the nation as a whole. Iowans are also older than Americans in general, more religious, and more rural than in the rest of the country too, so the most concrete lesson we can learn from the caucuses is that old, white, rural Republicans tend to vote for Donald Trump, which shouldn't shock anyone.

The Out-of-Touch Adults' Guide to Kid Culture: Why is Everyone Talking About 'Saltburn'?

This week, the kids are suffering through the long winter by watching Saltburn, bidding farewell to a very popular YouTuber, and getting themselves stuck in urns. Plus, tunnels somehow remain newsworthy.

What’s the story with Saltburn?

The entertainment landscape is different than it was pre-internet. Technology lets us hone in on our personal interests with such intensity that shared cultural experiences are rare. That’s why Saltburn is cool. It's one of those “everyone is talking about it” movies that don’t come around too often these days. And it’s actually good! If you’re not in the know, Saltburn was released in theaters in November, where it made a modest $21.3 million, but it found a second life on Prime Video.

Drawing inspiration from A Clockwork Orange, The Talented Mr. Ripley, and late-stage capitalism, Saltburn is a dark comedy about a debauched young man obsessed with wealth and excess who is willing to do anything to get it. It's intentionally confrontational, leading to controversy over its graphic sex and violence, summed up best by this quote/stealth advertisement from the professional hand-wringers at ParentPreviews.com: "This film contains so much negative content that we do not expect our reviewers to watch it." (That's some fearless journalism, guys.) Saltburn was directed by Emerald Fennell and stars Barry Keoghan as anti-hero Oliver Quick. The movie’s ending inspired copycat memes, leading to charges that rich people proudly dancing around in their expensive houses have entirely missed the point of the film. It’s a classic class-war battle: rich people being callow and poor people being bitter that rich people really don’t care what they think. Another ripple from the film: a semi-obscure retro-disco track from 2001, “Murder on the Dance Floor” from Sophie Ellis-Bextor, has resurfaced and been enjoyed by many more people than it was upon its release.

Urn Guy is 2024’s first Guy!

Guy Stuck In Vase, or Urn Guy, is the first internet-guy of 2024! He joins past guys like Blinking White Guy, Ancient Aliens Guy, and Ridiculously Photogenic Guy in the internet's Guy Hall of Fame. Urn Guy earned his spot when a video of him trapped in an urn went viral in early 2024. His name is supposedly Connor, and his getting-stuck antics reportedly happened at a house party in Mountain Brook, Alabama. His fame began with a post on X (formerly Twitter) describing the situation. “He was laughing at first but now he’s starting to get upset. The women are trying to comfort him. There is talk of attempting to break the urn,” reported @CasualThursday on X. Then the video was posted. The rest is internet history. Connor (if that’s actually his name) was uninjured and was eventually broken free of his prison via sledgehammer. @CasualThursday reports, “Urn guy is up and moving around, but now without his pants, which were apparently lost or damaged in the incident.” 

Rumors of the Nintendo Switch 2

Nintendo has created such a rabid and loyal fanbase over its long life (the company was founded in 1889) that any move it makes sends waves of speculation through the gaming community. This week, Nintendo quietly discontinued physical copies of many of its top-tier titles like Super Mario Odyssey and Splatoon 2, leading to speculation that the company might be planning to release the Switch 2. Really? Ya think? There’s a definite generational gap between people who get excited that Nintendo might release a new console and people like me who think, “The Nintendo Switch made a lot of money, and Nintendo has released new consoles regularly since the 1980s; so, yeah, it's petty likely that they’re planning to repeat the cycle.” 

The tunnel craze continues

Tunnels are having a cultural moment. We learned about the intriguing tunnel girl last week (she's an amateur engineer who built an underground lair beneath her suburban home). This week, tunnel girl is out; tunneling Jews are in. Hassidic members of the Chabad-Lubavitch movement were discovered to have been digging an extensive tunnel under their Brooklyn headquarters recently. Unlike Tunnel Girl’s seemingly solid construction, their mole-like antics drew the attention of authorities and fears that they caused structural damage to their historic synagogue. The purpose of their tunnel isn’t entirely clear, but it has split the congregation into pro- and anti-tunneling camps. Because we live in a depressing world, antisemite conspiracy theorists immediately seized on the story and added it to their long-running historical fan fiction about “elites” doing unspeakable acts to children underground, instead of just enjoying the oddness of the situation.  

Viral video of the week: MatPat's goodbye video

This week’s viral video, Goodbye Internet, is a so-long-and-farewell message from greatly-beloved-by-kids YouTuber MatPat, whose channel, The Game Theorists, has over 18 million subscribers. The 25-minute video has been viewed over 14 million times since it was posted a couple days ago. According to MatPat, he’s throwing in the towel because he’s getting old—he’s 37, which is ancient in YouTube years—and basically because he wants to have more time and more fun in his life. His last Game Theorist video will be posted in March, after which the channel will be taken over by a person or people unknown. 

This is, no doubt, a generational thing, but I don’t get the appeal of this dude and this entire subgenre of gaming videos. MatPat’s stock-in-traded is crafting elaborate fan theories about popular video game franchises like Five Nights at Freddys, Minecraft, and Legend of Zelda. Charitably, his popularity is kids enjoying content analysis of the media they love, but I find it insufferable. MatPat’s amped-up delivery is exhausting to listen to, and his theories inevitably leave me thinking “yeah, maybe, but who cares?” It’s the online equivalent of smoking weed with your dumb friends and talking about whether Darth Vader actually had a point, or what’s really going on with Scooby Doo, but without the weed and connection to other people.  

What People Are Getting Wrong This Week: Where Coffee Comes From, for Starters

The 2024 Global Risks Report issued this week from the World Economic Forum named misinformation and disinformation as the greatest risk to humanity over the next two years. "People believing weird crap" beat "interstate armed conflict" (number 5), "societal polarization" (number 3) and "extreme weather events" (number 2) for the coveted title.

The report warns that bad actors will use artificial intelligence to flood the world's information channels with false narratives and propaganda, potentially affecting elections on a scale never seen before, leading to civil unrest, and encouraging Draconian censorship as states try to control the flow of information. Somewhere around half of the population of Earth is expected to participate in elections in 2024 and 2025, so there is a lot of money and power at stake, and AI's ability to easily produce hyper-specific propaganda will no doubt be widely employed to influence the power structures that affect the lives of just about everyone on earth. Since there is nothing anyone can do to prevent this, I'm going to focus on coffee instead.

I learned today that coffee is not brewed from beans. "The beans you brew are actually the processed and roasted seeds from a fruit, which is called a coffee cherry," according to the National Coffee Association USA. Correcting that small personal misconception about my favorite drink made me feel a little better in the face of the global tsunami of bullshit that the World Economic Forum predicts, so here are six more things you may have always been wrong about.

"A dog year is equal to seven human years"

This oft-repeated "rule" dates back to the 1950s, and was always more about getting a rough estimate than an exact measurement of dog years. Back then, dogs (generally) lived to be about 10 and humans, on average, lived until they were around 70, so the math works out. But different dog breeds have different expected lifespans. Australian Cattle Dogs average around 14 years, where a French Bulldog is lucky to see its fifth birthday. And anyway, people live longer now, so the whole equation doesn't work anymore, even as a rough estimate.

"Humans have five senses"

"I've got one, two, three, four, five, senses working overtime," XTC sung in its 1982 new-wave banger "Senses Working Overtime." But we actually have several more senses than sight, hearing, touch, taste, and smell. There's our sense of direction and our sense of object permanence. Balance is a sense. We sense movement, heat, pain, and the passage of time, all of which could be defined as separate senses. We might have as many as 33 senses. Some of this information comes from the World Economic Forum, which gives me a sense of foreboding and dread.

"Water conducts electricity"

Pure water is an insulator that doesn't conduct electricity. The tricky word in that sentence is "pure." Pure water is distilled and absent any ions. It's usually only seen in laboratories for specific purposes. The water we bathe in, drink, and long to drown in when we read news from the World Economic Forum is never pure. It's choked with dissolved minerals, pollution, and especially ions. The ions conduct the electricity, though, not the water. It's a technicality, and annoying, but it's still true.

"Different parts of your tongue taste different flavors"

There used to be "tongue maps" that indicated which part of your tongue had receptors for which flavors, but tongue research has come a long way since then, and we now know that taste buds for different flavors are scattered all over the tongue, and you can taste everything, everywhere. This misinformation dates back to a scientific paper published in German in 1875, which was mistranslated into English in 1901. For more than 90 years, people believed this, even though we all have tongues right in our own heads!

"Blowing into a broken Nintendo cartridge fixes it"

Fixing a Nintendo or other cartridge-based video game by taking it out and blowing into it doesn't work. When a game isn't working, it's usually because the pins aren't matching up. Every time you take the cartridge out and put it back in, you're giving the pins another chance to align correctly, but there's no need to blow. You could see how this would seem to work, though.

I find this myth fascinating because it was a universally accepted practice before there was much of an internet to spread misinformation. How did everyone, everywhere, think to do the same thing, at the same time? Maybe some long-forgotten kid tried it on an Atari 2600 cartridge in front of his friends, and they spread it from there like a virus.

"Fortune cookies are Chinese"

Fortune cookies did not originate in China. They originated in Kyoto, Japan in the 1870s. Makoto Hagiwara was the first person to sell fortune cookies in the U.S. at the Japanese Tea Garden in San Francisco in the 1890s or early 1900s. In the early days, they were apparently known as "fortune tea cakes" due to their Japanese origins, but in the 1940s, when the U.S. sent Japanese Americans to internment camps, it's thought that Chinese businessmen were able to take over the manufacture and distribution of the confection, leading to its association with Chinese restaurants.

The Best Sites and Apps to Track Your Books, Movies, Music, and Video Games

I rang in 2024 the same way I have ever since 2011: By setting my annual reading goal on Goodreads. I don't read nearly as much as I used to—blame kids, the loss of a daily commute, emotional fallout from a global pandemic, what have you—but I still want to give myself a bar to clear, even if it's a lot lower than it used to be (this year I'm aiming for 35 books, which might sound like a lot or a little, but keep in mind I'm counting the books I read aloud to my kid).

A few years ago in the Guardian, writer Rachel Sigee pondered the question of why so many of us frequent sites like Goodreads and Letterboxd to log our media consumption, and came up with an answer that seems obvious in retrospect: It’s dopamine.

Yes, the same addictive brain chemicals that cause our neurons to fire every time our phones light up with a notification are what keep us marking our progress in the books we’ve read or assigning a star rating to every movie we’ve watched or tracking the hours we’ve poured into a particularly immersive video game. Or (and this is where things get slightly insidious), to build lists of all the things we want to—or feel we “should”—read, or watch, or play.

It’s worth considering (as Sigee does) whether it is healthy to “gamify” what is essentially a leisure time activity in this way, and as a hardcore media logger, I will admit to sometimes feeling a sense of exhaustion at contemplating the lengthy lists of all things media I want to consume that I will probably never get around to. Unless I figure out a way to live forever and also abandon my job and family responsibilities.

But I’m also not going to stop doing it. Even before technology presented methods to make it easier, I intermittently have kept lists of, say, the movies I watched with my then-girlfriend, now spouse. Like scrolling through photos in my phone, just seeing the name of a film on that list would trigger my memories of where we were when we saw it or the conversations we had afterward. So much of daily life is ephemeral; keeping a record of a given day—even if it’s just something as inconsequential as finally watching Weekend at Bernie’s (a surprisingly weird movie) can give you an anchor to cling to.

So with all that high-falutin’ nonsense aside, here are some of the best sites and apps around to help you start keeping track of your own media habits: books, movies, video games, and music.

The best apps to log your reading

Goodreads is by far the most widely used book tracker, but there are alternatives if you don’t want to serve up yet more of your data to corporate owner Amazon.

Goodreads. You know about this one. Goodreads has been around for going on two decades now, and since its acquisition by Amazon in 2013, the site has amassed a membership of some 90 million readers eager to catalog what they’ve read and provide status updates on what they’re reading. In many ways, it set the standard for these types of social cataloguing apps, allowing you to customize your books into various shelves, write and read reviews, befriend and follow other users, make recommendation lists, and more. It’s not perfect—the UX is basically unchanged from the site’s infancy, the design is cluttered and unintuitive, and the mobile app is incredibly slow—but you probably use it anyway.

LibraryThing. Founded in 2005, a year before Goodreads, LibraryThing has always been that site’s slightly stuffier, more serious competitor. Originally run via paid subscriptions, it has since switched to a free-for-all model, but still aims to deliver the goods without inundating you with ads. While it offers many of the same social features as Goodreads, it’s definitely tilted more toward the serious business of keeping track of and cataloging your own reading.

Other options to consider: Libib, BookSloth, and The Storygraph

The best apps to log the movies you’ve watched

When it comes to tracking your movies, there’s a clear winner (which also happens to be one of my favorite sites on the internet).

Letterboxd. This app- and web-based movie tracking social network has amassed a user base of more than 20 million film fans, and with good reason: It’s incredibly easy to search and log every movie (and, more recently, a growing number of TV shows) you’ve ever seen, add dates watched (I recently found a stack of old ticket stubs and logged a bunch of films I saw in the theater 15 years ago), pen reviews, and follow other users. You can build lists based on any esoteric, hyper-specific qualifier you can think of. Plus, there’s a view that shows you the posters of every movie you’ve logged on one screen, which is neat. (Stop by and say hi!)

SIMKL. This lesser-known Letterboxd competitor has many of that site’s features and strengths, with one big bonus: Its database also includes a ton of TV series and anime (until recently, Letterboxd generally eschewed TV entirely, save for a few “event” miniseries like WandaVision). You can mark an entire series as watched, or keep track of which episodes you’ve seen and how many you have left, making it that much easier to manage the glut of streaming series you’re trying and failing to stay on top of. But the coolest feature is the Chrome extension that integrates with your streaming service watch history, allowing you to log your viewing history in SIMKL without ever leaving Netflix.

Another option to consider: Trakt (originally geared toward tracking your TV consumption, it can also be used to track your movies and like Simkl, integrate with your smart TV, phone, or computer to log media automatically)

The best sites to log your video games

There doesn’t seem to be a definitive video game alternative to the likes of Letterboxd or Goodreads—and though I’ll discuss comparable options to those services below, neither has reached the same level of awareness. Perhaps that’s because...

Your system probably does it for you. Most modern consoles make the need to log your games obsolete because they already track what you play and when, though you may need to fiddle around in your system menus to find it. The Nintendo Switch, for example, keeps tracked of the games played by each user profile, but if you want the really granular details, including exactly how much time a particular game was played on a particular day, you’ll need to download the associated Nintendo Switch Parental Controls app. Here’s how to see your hours played per game on PlayStation 5 and Xbox.

If you want a more complete accounting than just the amount of time sunk into a given title, though, you’re better off with a separate service.

Backloggd. Backloggd is the closest thing I’ve found to a “Letterboxd for video games,” (hence the name, probably). Currently only available via web (though an app is reportedly in the works), the site allows you to catalog games as completed (along with whether you “mastered,” or “abandoned” them, or a few other options), backlogged (meaning you own them but haven’t played them yet), the games you are currently playing, or add games to a wishlist. You can log “playthroughs” (the dates you actually played a game), review games you’ve marked played, and browse other users’ profile pages and follow them if you choose. The site is continually adding new features, but it already offers most everything I’m looking for.

  • Get started on Backloggd on the web (there's no app version).

Grouvee. This one seems to have taken Goodreads as its inspiration. You can mark games as played, currently playing, backlogged, or wishlisted; write (and read) reviews; and mark your dates played. What sets this site apart is the ability to add status updates for games in progress, which is a nice touch if you want to keep track of when you beat a particular level or boss or what have you.

  • Get started on Grouvee on the web (no app version is available).

Board Game Geek. If you're a gamer, but of the board game variety, you need to know about Board Game Geek. One of the largest and most established board game communities online, the site allows you to rate the games you play, read others' reviews, and find new games to play, with each game's page offering stats like how challenging it is to learn and how long it might take to finish a round.

Other options to consider: GG, Completionator (which allows you to import your Steam library), and HowLongToBeat.

The best app to log the music you love

Like video games, there isn’t nearly as robust a music-logging infrastructure out there—again, probably because services like Spotify and Amazon Music mostly keep track of that for you. Still, there is at least one music-lovers social network out there worth considering.

Last.fm. If you want a no fuss way to aggregate and track all the music you stream, Last.fm is a great choice. The app integrates with most major streaming services (including YouTube, Spotify, and Pandora, though you'll have to jump through extra hoops to use it with Amazon Music or Apple Music) to log everything you listen to and when. Via the desktop and mobile apps, you can see your own listening history, track what your friends are streaming, and access weekly and yearly roundups (who needs Spotify Wrapped?).

  • Get started with Last.fm on the web or download the mobile (Android, iOS) or desktop apps (sorry Windows users—the desktop app is Mac-only).

Musicboard. Musicboard bills itself as “a social platform that allows you to keep track of all the music you listen to and grow your passion for music with friends” and, sure, it does that. You can use it to create a profile, keep track of the albums and songs you’ve listened to, write reviews, and follow other users. There are cool tools to show off your listening history, track forthcoming releases, and (if you’re willing to pony up $3.99/month for a paid subscription) view super granular stats about your listening habits.

Discogs. More a tool to help you manage your personal music collection than a real-time tracking or social app—though the site does include community forums, alongside editorial content geared toward helping you find new music—this longstanding site is nevertheless a great way to keep track of all of the physical and digital music you own. Once you've created your account, you can go about building your collection—and you won't just be able to add, say, a particular album, but the exact version of the album you own, so you'll be able to keep track of all of the different-colored versions of Taylor Swift vinyl releases you've amassed. THe site's layout favors an abundance of information over ease of use, so it can be a little overwhelming at first, but once your onboard, it will provide an at-a-glance assessment of everything you own, and what it might be worth.

Or just use a spreadsheet (or a notebook) to track everything

The most versatile, low-effort way to keep track of anything you’re reading or watching or playing is, of course, to just log it away manually in a spreadsheet (or a notebook, if you’re into that tactile, “real objects” shit). This is certainly a valid method—we love spreadsheets around here—but you’ll sacrifice the visual and/or social sharing aspects of other app-based options.

Maybe you’re OK with that—let’s be honest, there’s a good chance you are the only one who cares about your media habits anyway. Personally, I like the incentive of things like keeping up with a Goodreads reading challenge or filling out my Letterboxd diary to keep me on track; past pen and paper attempts have failed to stick, resulting in years of lost data. And while sites and apps come and go, there’s no chance your notebook is going to stop working.

Updated on Jan. 5, 2024 to add new options for tracking your music and games.

The Out-of-Touch Adults' Guide to Kid Culture: Who Is 'Tunnel Girl'?

This week we're enjoying the post-holiday glow with some wholesome goings-on in the world of young people. They're digging tunnels under their homes, surprising their grandparents with impromptu sleepovers, beating Tetris, and launching themselves over desks to attack district court judges. (Wait, that last one isn't wholesome at all.)

Who is “Tunnel Girl” and why is everyone digging her so much?

I love when people become famous for something weird and unexpected, and this week, a star like that was born on TikTok: "Tunnel Girl" has captured America’s heart with the elaborate mining operation she maintains under her suburban home. She’s been digging for over a year and documenting the process in a fascinating series of TikTok videos. Kala started her secret tunnel project with the idea of excavating stones to build a castle, and over the last 12 or so months she’s taught herself electrical wiring, excavation, cement pouring, and more—and she’s built an army of loyal viewers dedicated to watching her progress. 

But, of course, nothing this beautiful can last. With her growing online fame came haters, one of whom seems to have reported her un-permitted construction project to the authorities. Tunnel Girl’s tunnel was reportedly shut down, with The Man insisting she have her work inspected by a professional engineer. Boo! I don’t know much about digging underground tunnels, but Tunnel Girl seems to know what she’s doing, so I say let her keep doing it. She says she's hopeful that the engineer will give her the all-clear and she can get back to digging to the center of the earth. 

Tunnel Girl got me thinking about whether homeowners actually own what's under their house. It turns out that, in general, they do. Property ownership includes all of the space above and below the surface of the earth, up to and including other planets and the center of the earth. In practice, however, you can’t keep airplanes from flying over your house (usually) and you don’t necessarily own the mineral rights to your land just because you own the land itself. 

Wholesome TikTok trend: grandparent sleepovers

My favorite new meme on TikTok is adult kids surprising their grandparents with sleepovers. It’s easy to do: Just grab your brothers and sisters and cousins and nephews and nieces and show up at Meema and Pop-Pops with some bedding. They probably don’t have anything to do, being retired, so they’ll probably be super happy you dropped in. I guess some curmudgeonly old people would be like, “damn, don’t show up at my house like a bum,” but most grandparents aren’t like that. All the grandmas in these videos cry while the grandpas look shocked. I wish my own Nana was alive so I could drop in. I would totally expect her to make me breakfast in the morning, but she wouldn’t mind. Please enjoy every one of these wholesome videos:

Waffle House has its own record label

TikTok user @thesleepyparamedic has discovered a new way to annoy the employees and customers at Waffle House. The breakfast chain’s locations are equipped with TouchTunes juke boxes, and they can be accessed remotely. So the prank is to download the TouchTunes app, click on “Find a Waffle house,” then send it some music. Some music about waffles. Not only is there a dedicated Waffle House playlist on TouchTunes, there’s an entire Waffle House record label that releases breakfast-based parody songs to be listened to a Waffle Houses across the country.

The “best” of these tunes, according to thesleepyparamedic, is “There Are Raisins in My Toast,” but my personal pick is the over-amped disco sounds of “Why Would You Eat Your Grits Anyplace Else?” Anyway, no matter which tune you choose (and you should choose only one), you can play it for an hour straight at any Waffle House across the country for like 10 bucks. That’s money well spent!  According to its website, “Waffle House is a destination for waffles AND music,” and who are we to argue?

Thirteen-year-old gamer beats Tetris

Thirteen-year-old gamer Willis Gibson, aka “Blue Scuti,” is the first person to ever beat the Nintendo version of Tetris. Tetris doesn’t have an “official” ending. In theory, the blocks will keep falling forever, but in practice, it turns out Tetris goes up to around level 157 before the game gives up and crashes, resulting in a coveted kill screen.

Beating Tetris has been an ongoing project in the extreme gaming community for years. It was once thought that level 29 was the “ending,” because that’s when the bricks start falling faster than it is humanly possible to push the controller button with your thumb. But players invented techniques called “hypertapping” and “rolling” that allow for faster inputs. Using these tricks, Blue Scuti was able to progress far enough to crash Tetris, a landmark accomplishment. Luckily, he was live-streaming at the time, so his reaction to the incredible feat was captured for posterity. Bonus: It's adorable.

Viral video of the week: defendant leaps at judge

Probably the most widely shared internet video this week is the feed from a criminal trial in Las Vegas. In it, defendant Deobra Delone Redden expresses his displeasure over his sentence for attempted battery by leaping over the bench to attack District Court Judge Mary Kay Holthus, only to be subdued and beaten down by court personnel. It’s a hell of a jump, to be sure, but the entire thing is depressing. So instead, watch this video from YouTube comedy video maker Drew Gooden, in which he watches only the final scenes of 10 terrible Christmas movies. It’s hilarious and won’t make you wonder how much longer society can hold together. 

The Best Songs, Movies, and Books Entering the Public Domain in 2024 (That Aren’t ‘Steamboat Willie’)

Along with hangovers and broken resolutions, the beginning of a new year means the rights to additional intellectual properties passing from their original owners, to you, the public—and 2024 is a particularly monumental year in that regard, considering it marks the entry into the public domain of one Mickey Mouse.

Disney has fought zealously to protect the copyright on its most iconic character since at least 1976, when it successfully encouraged Congress to pass the Copyright Act, which allowed owners to hold onto copyrights for the life of the work’s author, plus 50 years. In 1998, that term was lengthened to 75 years, or a maximum of 95 years. The clock finally caught up with Disney, and Mickey, Minnie, and all the cartoon stars of the iconic 1928 short “Steamboat Willie” now belong to the public. Kind of—the version of Mickey with the red shorts and big eyes is still owned by Disney; the black and white “Steamboat” version of Mickey is not.

Unsurprisingly, you can already find a ton of copyright free Steamboat Willie re-mixes and mash-ups online, or participate in a Mickey based crypto-currency scheme, or gird yourself for the horror movie Mickey’s Mouse Trap.

Given the attention garnered by Winnie the Pooh: Blood and Honey earlier this year, a cheap horror flick based on “Steamboat Willie” was to be expected, but Disney’s iconic rodent mascot isn’t the only beloved piece of art or culture you can claim for yourself as of Jan. 1, 2024.

Here are other notable works that just became free to everyone in the U.S.:

Notable books and plays that entered the public domain in 2024

  • D.H Lawrence’s Lady Chatterley's Lover: Someone should make a horror movie based on this British tale of an upper class woman’s affair with her groundskeeper. 

  • Bertolt Brecht, The Threepenny Opera: The German version of this Weimar-Republic-era musical set in the seedy underground of London is now free to translate, adapt, and otherwise fool around with. We’ll have to wait three years the rights to the 1931 film version to become available though. 

  • A.A. Milne’s The House at Pooh Corner: The character of Winnie the Pooh has been in the public domain since 2022, but his pal Tigger is newly free, allowing the iconic stuffed Tiger to appear in the sequel to the aforementioned (and terrible) Pooh-based horror movie Blood and Honey. 

  • Erich Maria Remarque’s All Quiet on the Western Front: I doubt you’ll be able to top Netflix’s excellent 2022 adaptation of this grim World War I story, but now you can try—the German version is newly in the public domain.

  • Wanda Gág’s Millions of Cats: This is the oldest U.S. picture book still in print. I really like the simple, black-and-white illustrations—and now they’re free, so I can make them into t-shirts. 

    Illustration from Million of Cats by Wanda Gág
    I only included the attribution of this picture to Wanda Gág to be nice. Credit: Wanda Gág

Notable films that entered the public domain in 2024

  • The Lights of New York: This story of New York lowlifes was advertised as the “first all-talking picture.” It’s now free to watch on YouTube, download, and share all you want.

  • The Circus: A full version of Charlie Chaplin’s big top movie isn’t currently on YouTube, but it’s only a matter of time until it appears. 

  • The Passion of Joan of Arc: If you’re only going to watch one silent movie from 1928, make it Carl Theodor Dreyer’s The Passion of Joan of Arc. It’s mind-blowing that the close-up was only invented about a decade before it was perfected in this movie. 

  • The Man Who Laughs: This creepy horror-melodrama features a main character with a huge grin carved in his face. Yes, the Joker is a total rip-off of Conrad Veidt's iconic take on the Victor Hugo character.

Conrad Veidt in The Man Who Laughs
This movie was owned by Warner Brothers a week ago. Credit: Public Domain
  • The Crowd: King Vidor’s sprawling, groundbreaking story of regular people crushed by an uncaring world predicted the misery of the great depression. It’s now free to watch, remake, and share. Dang, 1928 was just a great year for movies.

Notable songs that entered the public domain in 2024

  • Mack the Knife” This murder song from ThreePenny Opera is now free to record. At least, the German version is. Keep in mind: Individual recordings, like the Bobby Darin treatment, are not in the public domain. 

  • Lawdy, Lawdy Blues,” Ida Cox: This awesome old school blues song was recorded in 1923, making the recording public domain in 2024. 

  • Moonshine Blues,” Ma Rainey: Writing songs about getting drunk has been cool for over 100 years!

  • The Big Rock Candy Mountains” by Harry McClintock: This classic piece of hobo Americana is now in the public domain—but just the composition, not the recording. 

  • Let’s Do It. Let’s Fall in Love” by Cole Porter: If you want the opposite of hobo music, check out this sophisticated love song from the 1928 musical Paris

What People Are Getting Wrong This Week: Jeffrey Epstein

On a recent appearance on ESPN's The Pat McAfee Show, washed-up NFL quarterback Aaron Rodgers suggested that late night talk show host Jimmy Kimmel's name will show up in connection with notorious pedophile Jeffrey Epstein.

“There’s a lot of people, including Jimmy Kimmel, who are really hoping [the list of names a court is unsealing] doesn’t come out,” Rodgers, a dumb person, said. “If that list comes out, [I] definitely will be popping some sort of bottle.”

There was no bottle popping at the Rodgers' house. The names were released, and "Kimmel" was not one of them. Not that it matters to the Aaron Rodgerses of the world. They can say "Well, that isn't the real list anyway," or "of course his name isn't on the list. Disney covered it up," and go on with their day, secure in the knowledge that eventually it will come out that Jeffrey Epstein's friends were all Democrats, Donald Trump was not involved, and Kamala Harris was there too.

Dunking on Aaron Rodgers is easy, but the first Epstein conspiracy theory wasn't (only) a right-wing fever dream. It was/is widely believed by people across the political spectrum.

"Epstein didn't kill himself"

When the news dropped in 2019 that Jeffrey Epstein had committed suicide in his cell at a Manhattan jail, "Epstein didn't kill himself" immediately became a meme, spread by everyone from Joe Rogan to Arizona Congressman Paul Gosar, to Ricky Gervais, to everyone you follow on Twitter. The sentence was repeated so often that it largely seems to have been accepted as truth, but when you really look at it, "Epstein was murdered" is just as dumb as any other conspiracy theory.

Epstein, the story goes, was offed by a powerful person who didn't want their secrets revealed. (You can insert any rich person you don't like here: Maybe George Soros ordered the hit. Or it could have been Donald Trump.) Something about that feels so true, and so exciting, that people seem to have ignored the sordid, boring reality: prisoners kill themselves in jail all the time, because jails are terrible places, especially for pedophiles and pedophile billionaires.

While you can't prove a negative, the overwhelming evidence suggests that Epstein killed himself. There are the autopsy results that show he hanged himself, there is the fact that Epstein had tried to kill himself weeks before he succeeded (so he clearly wanted out), there is his psych report. But most importantly, there's common sense. Murdering a high-profile person inside a jail and then successfully covering it up is something that only happens in the movies. There are just too many moving pieces. Too many people would have to be bribed to look the other way. Too many things would have to be hidden from too many reporters. Too many things would have to have gone too perfectly.

Like all conspiracy theories, "Epstein was murdered" relies on cherry-picking tiny pieces of information and focusing on anomalies and coincidences ("the guards didn't check on him!" or "the cameras weren't working right!") that could support an already-arrived-at conclusion, while handwaving away huge pieces of evidence that point to a different, simpler explanation. Evidence like the actual autopsy, the police report, and the prison's own investigation. Epstein's proximity to other billionaires and power brokers gives people an easy way to patch over parts of the story that don't work. "Well, they're rich guys, so they can afford to hire ninjas who can break into an overcrowded jail without being seen, enter a locked cell, commit a murder that looks exactly like a suicide, and get out without being spotted."

Even if a rich person wanted to cover up their connection to Epstein, why would they assume he didn't have photos or videos that would be released if he was killed (since we're doing movie plots)? Why would they have waited until Epstein was in jail to take him out? Wouldn't it have been easier during the months before he surrendered himself to authorities? Or before he was even suspected?

What would George Soros/Donald Trump really get out of Epstein being dead anyway? The possibility of an elaborate murder-for-hire plot being exposed seems way more damaging than the legal testimony of a notorious pedophile. Why wouldn't Donald Soros just hire a good lawyer to say, "Your honor, this man is Jeffrey Epstein, so his testimony can be ignored."

Actual conspiracies that aren't theories

This isn't to say that conspiracies didn't happen here. There is credible evidence that at least one of the most powerful people on earth committed truly disgusting crimes with Epstein and tried to cover up their involvement. It sure looks like the federal authorities gave Epstein's a light sentence when he was originally caught. Two U.S. presidents actually did have some association with the guy (although we don't know what either of them actually did.) No doubt there is a lot that we don't know because lawyers and other professionals are being paid a lot to make sure we never find out.

But that doesn't mean we should just believe any old bullshit. The secrecy provided by Epstein's wealthy friends and the overwhelming strangeness of the whole situation has created a Schrödinger's Pedophile situation, where you can use the case to grind whatever axe you like and you'll never be proven wrong. But you will end up looking like Aaron Rodgers, though, and who wants that?

Skoove Premium Piano Lessons Are on Sale for $120 Right Now

You can get a lifetime subscription to Skoove Premium piano lessons on sale for $119.99 right now with promo code ENJOY20 through March 10. The app comes with over 400 lessons and thousands of instructional videos from experienced Skoove music instructors, and it also provides real-time feedback so you can improve every step of the way. It was an App Store Editors Choice with 4.5 out of 5 stars, and includes a wide range of music--from fundamental pianists like Bach and Beethoven, to more modern artists like John Legend and Adele. And whenever you are struggling or have doubts, Skoove also comes with one-on-one support options. The app is compatible with all pianos and keyboards, both USB/MIDI or acoustic, and since there's obviously no shipping, it can make a great last-minute present.

You can get a lifetime subscription to Skoove Premium piano lessons on sale for $149.99 right now with promo code ENJOY20 through March 10 at 11:59 p.m. PT, though prices can change at any time.

Eight Popular ‘Christmas Songs’ That Aren’t Actually Christmas Songs

Every year the holiday season seems to get longer. By the time Christmas actually arrives, you’ve heard more than your fair share of Christmas music—it’s practically inescapable. And every holiday playlist looks nearly the same as the next; if you search for “Christmas music” on any platform you’ll get similar results—including a bunch of songs that have become closely associated with the holiday but aren’t actually Christmas songs except by association.

Sometimes these non-Christmas Christmas songs make sense, because their lyrical imagery is all wintry and it’s easy to see the holidays implied within them. But if you pause for a moment to really think about those lyrics, it’s usually pretty obvious what is and isn’t an actual, bona-fide Christmas song. Here are eleven that snuck into the holiday season under false pretenses.

“Winter Wonderland”

A constant on holiday playlists, “Winter Wonderland” started life as a poem composed by Richard Bernhard Smith as he recovered from a bout of tuberculosis in 1934. Isolated in a sanitarium due to his very contagious disease, Smith passed the time entering contests writing commercial jingles for companies. Waking up to a fresh snowfall one day, he wrote the words that would become this holiday classic. Music was composed for it that same year, and it became an instant hit—but there’s zero mention of Christmas in there, and the song was never really intended as a holiday song at all.

“Jingle Bells”

Composed in 1857 by James Pierpont, “Jingle Bells” was originally called “One Horse Open Sleigh.” It is technically a holiday song—it was originally intended to be a Thanksgiving-themed tune. The full song is actually kind of mischievous, telling a tale of young men racing their sleighs, trying to pick up girls, and getting into a violent crash. It’s essentially a call to sow those wild oats while you can, so it’s kind of remarkable that it’s become a Christmas classic.

“Jingle Bell Rock”

Written by a pair of middle-aged executives and recorded by an up-and-coming country music star named Bobby Helms, “Jingle Bell Rock” doesn’t just lack any sort of literal Christmas spirit—it purposefully lacks it. According to the Los Angeles Times, Helms came from a pretty religious background, and knew his mother wouldn’t approve of mixing religion with rock n’ roll (this was 1957, when rock music was still considered a dangerous trend corrupting the youth of America). So he made certain the lyrics were completely religion-free.

“Let It Snow! Let It Snow! Let It Snow!”

Written by Sammy Cahn and Jule Styne in 1945, “Let It Snow! Let It Snow! Let It Snow!” (yes, the official title has the phrase repeated three times) was inspired by the very opposite of Christmastime: a heat wave. Sweltering in the California heat in the age before air conditioning was commonly available, the songwriters conjured up an image of a cold, snowy morning to cool their overheated nerves, and a holiday classic that never once mentions Christmas was born.

“Frosty The Snowman”

Perhaps the most irritating Christmas song of all time is associated with the holiday in large part due to the beloved 1969 television special built around the song, in which a snowman comes to life via magical hat and terrorizes a neighborhood. But the song itself was conceived as a more generic winter season song, written specifically for Gene Autry in 1950 as a follow-up to his smash hit “Rudolph the Red-Nosed Reindeer.” When the TV special was conceived, the plot of the song was expanded and the Christmas stuff was shoehorned in, including an altered final lyric that changed “back again some day” to “back on Christmas Day.”

“Linus And Lucy” By The Vince Guaraldi Trio

Originally composed to be on the soundtrack of a documentary, the song that became the jazz standard (and unofficial theme song of the Peanuts cartoons) has no lyrical content at all. The only reason we associate it with Christmas is its debut as part of the soundtrack for A Charlie Brown Christmas in 1965. Even though the song appeared in all the subsequent Charlie Brown specials and doesn’t even feature bells or other holiday-esque touches, it’s considered a Christmas song as a result.

“Sleigh Ride”

“Sleigh Ride” is another Christmas classic that is both inspired by a heat wave and has nothing to do with Christmas. Composer Leroy Anderson was cooped up in a hot cottage in Connecticut during a hot 1946 summer, and wrote “Sleigh Ride” while wishing for cooler weather. He describes it as “just another piece of music that I wrote.”

“My Favorite Things”

This classic song is now known primarily thanks to Julie Andrews and The Sound of Music, but it made its public debut in 1959 as part of the Broadway production of the story. It was not originally intended as a holiday-themed song, but when the film was poised to be released in 1965, producers worried that they didn’t have a hit song driving ticket sales, so they approached singer Jack Jones about recording one of the songs in hopes of landing on the charts. Jones was making a Christmas album, and liked “My Favorite Things,” but worried that it wasn’t really a Christmas song. The solution? “Just add sleigh bells.” It worked.

The Best Gifts for the Person Who Has Everything

Struggling to find the perfect present for someone picky or who simply seems to have it all? Instead of resorting to boring gift cards, let's get creative this holiday season. Consider these unique gift ideas for those on your list who are extra difficult to buy for.

Give an experience

Obvious, yet underrated. For the person who buys whatever they want for themselves as soon as they want it, shift your gifting focus to experiences. Book them a cooking class, wine tasting, pottery workshop, concert tickets, or other events you know match their interests. Giving events and activities creates lasting memories compared to more stuff.

Surprise travel

If your budget allows, surprise that frequent jet-setter or travel lover with elements of a trip like plane tickets, hotel bookings, or even full travel packages. Or get creative with travel accessories, like monogrammed luggage tags, organizational packing items, and cozy blankets for the flight.


Products to consider:


Subscription boxes

For eclectic personalities who enjoy surprises, subscription box services make fantastic ongoing gifts, especially monthly ones that they'll continue to enjoy in the months following Christmas. There are a ton of different subscription boxes out there that deliver curated items like books, coffee, healthy snacks, or even exotic meats and alcohol. You pay for a recurring shipment for a set period—like 3, 6 or 12 months—in which they'll receive items tailored to the recipient's unique tastes. Consider a flower subscription service for the eco-conscious, an Atlas coffee club subscription for the caffeine addicts in your life, or perhaps a snazzy Japanese snack box.

Fancy consumables

Lifehacker's Alice Bradley got a Murray's Cheese gift basket this year and "lost [her] dang mind." Cheese, candles, napkins—think really elevated versions of everyday stuff, like cashmere socks and fancy hand soap. I mean, who doesn't need a new (or back-up) umbrella? (And when is anyone going to buy an umbrella for more than five bucks, if not for a holiday gift?)

Charitable donations

A charitable donation gifted in someone's name can be meaningful for do-gooders and people passionate about social causes. You can choose a monetary amount or symbolic adoption of animals or trees through various nonprofit organizations. Print out a custom certificate to give the recipient announcing your donation made in honor of them.

Lifehacker managing editor Meghan Walbert recommends One Simple Wish, an organization that allows you to grant wishes for kids in foster care. Another option is to plant a tree in someone's name, which you can do here.

And hey—if they're a stinker about a charitable gift, then they should reflect on why they're so hard to buy gifts for in the first place. But hopefully, with a little extra thoughtfulness and creativity, you can make even the pickiest on your holiday shopping nice list light up.

What People Are Getting Wrong This Week: Disney Conspiracy Theories

Disney—the corporation, the man, and the way of life—has long been a flashpoint for misinformation and conspiracy theories. The corporation’s “have fun or we’ll break your arm” philosophy, the life of its enigmatic founder, and Disney's ownership of our collective imagination in the form of Marvel, Star Wars, and more, make it seem like anything you hear about Disney could be true. When you factor in the unbelievable-but-verifiable facts about the company and the man, no one could be faulted for mistaking Disney fiction for Disney fact. Maybe Disneyland really was used for CIA mind control experimentation! You don't know!

Disney is currently the boogeyman of cranks on the right side of the political spectrum, with extremists calling for boycotts of its parks and cruises over their “wokeness” and allegations that the corporation's real purpose is not making money, but "grooming" children. But Disney used to be every bit as deeply distrusted by cranks on the left—not for grooming kids, but for its corporate malfeasance and cynical profiteering. The result: There are many flavors of misinformation to enjoy in the expanded Disney Conspiracy Universe. Below, I’ve compiled a collection of lies about Disney, along with an equal number of truths that are nearly as unbelievable. 

Lie: Disney’s head was cryogenically frozen

The granddaddy of all Disney conspiracy theories is the one about Walt Disney attempting to cheat death by freezing his head (or his whole body) so he could be thawed out and reanimated at some future date. This story originated as far back as 1967, when a reporter for a tabloid called The National Spotlite claimed he’d snuck into the hospital where Walt Disney died and saw his body had been frozen in liquid nitrogen. From there, it caught on and grew for no real reason beyond the fact that it seemed like something Walt Disney might do. Sadly, the rumors are not true: Disney was cremated and his ashes are interred in Glendale.

Truth: Disneyland still maintains an apartment for Walt Disney

Walt Disney spent so much time at Disneyland during its construction that he had an apartment built for himself above the firehouse on Main Street so he could avoid commuting to work. Sensible maybe, but why did Disneyland keep the rooms as he left them after he died? Why is there a light on in the window to this day? The park occasionally offers tours of the room (for a price, of course), but is it really a stretch to think the real reason they keep Walt's apartment is because they’re hoping he'll will return one day, with his thawed head attached to a new body, ready to start production on Song of the South 2? (Yes.)

Lie: Walt Disney was a Nazi

As far as we know, Walt Disney was not a Nazi—but it’s complicated. When Nazi propagandist Leni Riefenstahl visited Hollywood in 1938, the industry gave her a cold shoulder—but not Walt Disney. Walt gave Riefenstahl a tour of his studios, but he refused to watch or endorse Olympia, Riefenstahl's documentary about the 1936 Olympics. He also hired a lot of Jewish people who never reported any incidents of antisemitism. But the best evidence for Disney's non-Nazism is an anti-Nazi cartoon Disney produced. "Der Fuehrer's Face" stars Donald Duck and features music by Spike Jones, and it is such an effective takedown of Nazi Germany that it's doubtful a Nazi would have approved it.

Truth: Walt Disney was a racist

Disney’s live action/animation feature Song of the South is racist, and not just when viewed through modern eyes. During its production, both the NAACP and the American Council on Race Relations basically told Disney, “Hey, your movie is really racist.” The Hays Office reviewed the script and demanded the removal of objectionable racial terms. Crew members quit the production over the film’s depiction of African Americans, and it was met with protests on its release. So Walt knew full well that his movie was racist, but he didn’t care, and made no move to make it less racist.

Lie: Disneyland is removing Donald Trump from its “Hall of President” display

This piece of outrage bait comes from the “satirical” website Mouse Trap News, an outlet that propagates many fake news stories designed to appeal to modern conservatives’ hatred of Disney. Donald Trump will remain in the Hall of Presidents, so bored visitors seeking an air conditioned place to sit can check out his animatronic likeness. (Also, for the record: Disneyland is not planning to serve human flesh in any of its restaurants or snack bars, Moana is not “the First Transgender Disney Princess,” and Mickey Mouse is not going to play a leading in The Mandalorian season 4.)

Truth: Richard Nixon loved Disneyland

Until recently, our most corrupt president (as far as we know) Richard Nixon was also a huge Disney fan. He visited Disneyland multiple times, oversaw the dedication of the Monorail when he was vice-president, and, when president, invited Disneyland’s Golden Horseshoe Revue to perform at the annual White House Correspondents’ dinner. (I'm sure they delighted D.C.'s cynical political reporters.) But the best Disney/Nixon crossover of all is the fact that Nixon’s famous “I am not a crook” speech was delivered on the grounds of Disney’s Contemporary Resort in Florida.

Lie: Lemmings commit mass suicide

This isn’t a myth about Disney, but one that Disney helped spread. The mistaken belief that lemmings intentionally kill themselves when their population reaches a certain point existed before Disney’s 1958 “documentary” White Wilderness, but the film cemented the untruth in the popular imagination by showing footage of hundreds of lemmings leaping off a cliff to their deaths. Except the lemmings were actually pushed off the cliff to get the footage. To be fair: The Walt Disney Family Museum says that photographer and filmmaker James R. Simon Simon faked the footage without the approval of Walt Disney.

Half truth: Walt Disney’s last words were “Kurt Russell”

While he didn't mutter "Kurt Russell" on his death bed (again, as far we know), the actor's name was the last thing Walt Disney wrote before he was brought to the hospital, where he died due to complications of lung cancer. At the time of Disney's death, Russell was a 15-year-old actor on the Disney lot shooting Now You See Him, Now You Don’t. Russell’s name appears in Walt’s hand on sheet of paper with the printed title “TV Projects In Production: Ready for Production or Possible for Escalation and Story.” No one knows exactly why. "I assume, as [does] everybody else, that he was talking about some movie that he was thinking about having me in…I don't know what to make of it other than that," Russell once told Barbara Walters.

Lie: No one is allowed to die at a Disney park

There is a widely believed rumor is that Disney is so protective of its parks’ image that they will transport dead or dying people off the property to ensure that no one will ever be declared dead at a Disney park. While Disney has never publicly disclosed its internal policy regarding guest deaths, people have indeed been declared dead at Disney parks at various times over the years.

Truth: The Beatles broke up at Disney World

While the end of The Beatles didn’t involve an ill-fated ride on the Matterhorn, it is true that the Beatles broke up while at a Disney resort. John Lennon signed the legal papers finalizing his exit from the band while he was on vacation at the Disney World Polynesian Resort. You can even stay in the “death of the Beatles” room if you want.

Lie: Walt Disney’s will contains a clause promising $10 million to the first man who gets pregnant

This is really strange rumor that spread through chain emails in the 2000s. There doesn’t seem to be a discernible reason to believe that this could be so—Disney never said or did anything in his life that suggests he had any interest in seeing this scenario play out—but there is something weirdly plausible about the theory. It just feels like something that’s true. But it’s not. From what we know about Disney's will, he actually left 45% of his estate to his immediate family, 45% to the Disney Foundation, and 10% his sister, nieces, and nephews. 

Truth: Harlan Ellison was fired from Disney for imitating Disney characters having sex

Irascible science fiction writer Harlan Ellison once worked for Disney, and according to an autobiographical essay in his 1982 book Stalking the Nightmare, Ellison's tenure ended after one day at lunch with his co-workers when he jokingly suggested Disney should make a porn movie starring his well-known creations. He then acted out the noises various Disney characters might make in said porn movie. What Ellison didn’t realize was that Roy Disney was at the next table and overheard the whole routine. Roy apparently didn’t find it amusing, and Ellison was terminated. 

The Out-of-Touch Adults' Guide to Kid Culture: TikTok's 'Name a Woman' Challenge

This week, young people are donning spy glasses, undressing one another through AI, making a football agent famous, and asking each other whether they can “name a woman.” If you can draw any conclusions as to what it all means, please leave a comment below.

Like deepfakes, but worse: the rise of AI undressing apps

Deepfake of Wilford Brimley
Credit: Unstable Diffusion - Stephen Johnson

Computer-created fake nude images of celebrities have been around for decades (like the alluring deepfake of Wilford Brimley above), but AI is now being used to create nudes of literally anyone users have a photo of. Welcome to the future, where “undressing” apps, programs that allow users to submit images and/or videos so an AI program can remove the subject’s clothing, are spiking in popularity—to the delight of creeps and weirdos everywhere.

According to a report published this week by social media analytics firm Graphika, companies that sell subscriptions to “synthetic non-consensual intimate imagery” services are advertising on mainstream platforms like Reddit and Twitter, and millions of users have already nude-ified images of their friends, teachers, and aunts. Twenty-four million people visited undressing websites in September alone according to the report.

While larger platforms like TikTok, Reddit, and Meta say they're taking steps to ban advertising related to undressing apps, there is currently no law against creating nude images of people without their consent (unless they’re underage), so there really isn’t anything that can be done. Other than stepping onto a nearby ice floe and riding it slowly into the Arctic Ocean.  

Why is everyone asking “name a woman?”

Back in 2013, TV game show Billy on the Street featured a segment where the titular host demanded that a passerby “name a woman” for prize money. The subject was not able to. It was funny, but recently the clip has inspired a TikTok challenge that’s 11 times funnier.

The “name a woman” challenge is simple: A woman points a cameras at their partner or another man in their life and demands that they “name a woman.” It seems like a very dumb trend at first, but the videos that result are hilarious. There’s the instant look of fear when the subjects try to suss out the expected answer, and the hilarious punchline of a dude naming an unexpected woman like Susan B. Anthony, Florence Nightingale, or Harriet Tubman.

The “correct” answer, as explained by Amanda Carlucio’s father, is the name of the woman in your life, who’s usually holding the camera. “What other woman would I say?” Carlucio asks. But the videos where the dude names someone like Anne Frank are way funnier.

Ray-Ban Meta Smart glasses take over TikTok

Ray-Ban Meta Smart Glasses
Credit: Ray-Ban

A decade after Google Glass fizzled, having a tiny camera hidden in your glasses is making a comeback. Eyewear maker Ray-Ban’s line of Meta Smart Glasses retail for $329 and allow users to livestream to Instagram and Facebook as well as stream music. Unlike Google glasses, they don’t look dorky—they’re styled like classic Wayfarers. 

As you might expect, TikTok is turning the high-tech spectacles very trendy. The hashtag #raybanmeta has over 124 million views, with the most popular vids being TikTokers playing Jungkook's song “3D” while looking in a mirror and dancing, a trend that started with user @wanna_be_ur_ex_boyfriend and spread outward to infinity. The videos' popularity led to parodies, like these videos of TikTokers taping iPhones and tablets to their faces, and this clever tutorial on how to fake the effect for way less than $329. 

New York Giant’s quarterback Tommy Devito’s agent goes viral

Tommy DeVito andSean Stellato
Credit: The 33rd Team - Twitter

Mainstream media may be exhaustingly covering the ins and outs of pop star Taylor Swift’s love affair with Kansas City Chief’s wide receiver Travis Kelce, but football’s most interesting relationship is between New York Giants quarterback Tommy Devito and his agent Sean Stellato.

After being caught on camera talking to his client on this week’s Monday Night Football broadcast and celebrating the Giant's unexpected victory, Stellato became instantly internet-famous for the strong “legitimate, Italian-American businessman” vibes his black and silver pinstripe suit and black fedora give off. Stellato’s picture immediately went viral on Twitter, leading to an interview with ESPN, coverage on CNN, and instant worldwide fame

Devito’s story is even better than his agent’s. The 25-year-old is an undrafted rookie who still lives at home with his parents. He was the Giants third-string QB who was only put on the field in week nine after a disastrous season start in which both the first and second string quarterbacks were injured. Unexpectedly, Devito led the dismal Giants to 3 victories and a 2% chance of making the playoffs.  

Viral video of the week: Car Thief Gets Instant Karma (the FINAL Glitterbomb 6.0)

YouTube mainstay Mark Rober’s “glitter bomb” videos have been an internet holiday tradition since the original was posted four years ago. This week, the sixth edition of the series was posted on YouTube, and Rober announced it is the final time he will create booby-trapped packages to surprise petty criminals. Watching people who gank an Amazon package from a stranger’s porch be terrified by loud noises, glitter and fart spray is kind of funny, but it’s also troubling: These aren’t hardened criminals we’re talking about, and is it really OK to laugh at the misfortune of the wretched? Perhaps to avoid the moral ambiguity around the series, the latest edition is not aimed at “porch pirates.” Instead, it features people who break into cars in San Francisco to make off with the laptop you left on the passenger seat. The piece includes some investigative reporting on how fencing stolen goods actually works in the City by the Bay too, as well as a fascinating diversion into why it’s difficult to break a car window with a baseball bat but effortless with a spark plug. Ultimately, the video reveals that car window smash-and-grabs don’t seem connected to organized crime. Instead, it’s perpetrated by the same kind of desperate bottom-feeders who steal packages. It’s probably good that this is the last glitter bomb video; it’s more sad than funny at this point. 

What to Do on Christmas When You Don't Celebrate

Christmas is the most wonderful time of the year—unless you don’t celebrate it. Then you’re stuck in a mostly shut down world with seemingly nothing to do. Fortunately, you still have quite a few options, whether you’re along or with friends, to make Dec. 25 a fun day off, regardless of your observances.

The Obvious Stuff: Chinese restaurants and movies

Chinese restaurants and movie theaters traditionally stay open on Christmas day for those of us who don't celebrate and/or have nowhere else to go. Just getting some orange chicken and seeing what's playing at the multiplex can make for a fun Christmas day. While this guide will include ways to find other activities, you shouldn’t rule out these tried-and-true non-Christmas activities. They’re staples of the un-holiday for a good reason.

Chinese food is a great Christmas option, but it's not the only choice

Finding a Chinese restaurant that’s open on Christmas doesn’t take much work. Just search Yelp for options near you. A few phone calls should find you a meal pretty quickly. If you’re in a larger city with a large cluster of Chinese restaurants (e.g. a Chinatown), you can head straight there—but don’t forget to make a reservation, even if it’s just dinner for you or a small party. Popular restaurants sometimes receive so much overflow business on Christmas day that they can’t accommodate everyone. You may not run into a problem, but it’s always better to be prepared.

If Chinese food isn’t your thing (or your reservation doesn’t work out), look at restaurants serving any non-European cuisine. This is a good time to check out that Vietnamese place you've been eyeing, or to get some Halah Thai food. Plenty of establishments that serve non-Western dishes do close on Christmas because they feel they won’t get enough business to justify the cost of staying open, so check the hours online or give them a call to make sure.

Going to the movies: A classic Christmas Day activity

For Christmas entertainment, movies are the traditional choice. Several new ones always come out on Christmas day, because theaters attract both people who don't celebrate Christmas, and people who celebrate the holiday but want to get away from their families. Going to the movies on Christmas is so popular, it's a good idea to get your tickets ahead of time—hit up Fandango, MovieTickets.com, or order directly from your theater of choice. Consider hitting up the out-of-the-way or pricier theater with the table service or the cushy recliners that you usually don't go to, which can make it feel like more of an occasion.

If there's a nearby theater that provides seat assignments, consider going there even if you have to drive a little further. Christmas is a very busy time at the movie theater and you don’t want to get stuck in the front row. Regardless of assigned seats, however, you should still arrive a little early. People traffic and parking can make you late on a busy day.

Some less-obvious options for Christmas day fun

Chinese restaurants and movie theaters aren’t the only establishments open on Christmas. A number of other retail chains—and even some local stores—keep limited hours for the minority who do not celebrate the holiday.

Activities

Several attractions remain open on Christmas day, especially in larger cities. As always, call ahead before making plans. Here are some options:

  • Go skiing or snowboarding: Most mountains are open on Christmas and the lift lines are blissfully empty. There's no better way of celebrating a winter-based holiday than on a wide open mountain.

  • Pretend to be a tourist: Tourist attractions tend to stay open on Christmas, especially in larger cities. This includes places like Madame Tussaud’s and Ripley’s Believe It or Not as well as zipline and Segway tours. Find out what’s local to your area and chances are they’ll have special Christmas hours. Of course, many tourist attractions don’t have to remain open for you to enjoy them. If want to check out a monument or historical landmark, they’re still around on Christmas and will cost you nothing.

  • Visit a park or skating rink: It may be cold outside (in some places), but if you bundle up you can enjoy a park or skating rink. Bring some friends and get a game of snow football together. Take a sled with you if your park has a big hill. When you get home, make some hot chocolate and enjoy being warm again.

  • Get a room: If you’ve got some spare cash lying around and have nothing better to do, get a room at a hotel. Hotels can’t really close on Christmas, and they typically offer plenty of amenities. As always, be sure to call ahead and find out if there are any Christmas day restrictions.

  • Volunteer: Not having anything to do on Christmas isn’t exactly a big life problem that needs solving. Other people have nowhere to go and nothing to eat. If you’ve got nothing to do, use that time to volunteer and help people who need it. Check your local homeless shelters and non-profit organizations for possibilities. Look at VolunteerMatch if you can’t locate anything easily. Your local Craigslist has a volunteer board you can look at as well.

  • Use Christmas as a catch-up day: Is everyone out of town? Have you been neglecting chores, work, your hobbies, or even working on a few DIY projects? While getting things done may not be anyone’s first choice on their day off, Christmas or otherwise, you can spend at least part of your day knocking a few things off your to-do list and the rest of the time relaxing. That way you’ll get a break and still feel accomplished.

  • Spend time with friends and family at home: Not celebrating Christmas doesn’t mean you can’t spend the day with family and/or friends. Get together with your family )(or family of choice) and play games, watch a movie, cook together, talk, or whatever else you’ll all enjoy. You don’t have to go out to have fun, so don’t rule out staying in with people you care about.

These are just a handful of options. A few local activities and attractions, such as arcades, laser tag, spas, and sports clubs often stay open on Christmas day. We couldn’t possibly list them all here, but call a few places to find out if they’re open. You might be surprised.

Many chain restaurants are open on Christmas Day

Some national chain restaurants remain open on Christmas day, so if you aren’t a fan of Chinese food you can often count on them. There's a restaurant chain open on Christmas Eve and Christmas Day for all tastes, from Applebee's, to Benihana, to Denny's, Fogo de Chão, and more. Keep in mind that all franchises often do not follow the same schedule, so while one Burger King may be open on Christmas, another may not. Call ahead first.

Drug and convenience stores are usually open. Grocery chains often are not

You won’t find much to celebrate at a store, but many chains traditionally stay open for a short time on Christmas day, including Walgreens, CVS, and 7-Eleven. Grocery store chains are generally not open on December 25—Costco, Kroger, Trader Joe's, Whole Foods, and many others will be shuttered for the holiday.

Plan ahead

Because so many places are closed on Christmas day, the one thing you must do is plan ahead. This won’t take more than 15-20 minutes in most cases, and can ensure you won’t run into any unwanted disappointments during the day. Just follow these steps:

  1. Make a list of the places you want to go.

  2. Call nearby locations to confirm they’ll be open, as not every chain follows corporate holiday hour recommendations. It’s always a good idea to find out their exact hours for Christmas day, too.

  3. Make reservations at any restaurant(s) you plan to visit.

  4. Put together a basic timeline of the day, accounting for travel time, so you don’t lose any reservations, miss a movie, or arrive after the store closes.

If you follow those steps you’ll be ready to enjoy a very special non-Christmas, whether you’re going solo or enjoying the day with others.

What People Are Getting Wrong This Week: The 'War on Christmas'

It's the holiday season, so I thought I'd take a look at the state of the supposed "War on Christmas." I was hoping to point to a bunch of outrageous beliefs religious people have about Christmas this year, but instead, it seems the furor over the holiday being under siege has died down.

This is not, however, a sign of progress.

The War on Christmas isn't new

The phrase "War on Christmas" originated in 2000 on this blog post by Peter Brimelow, but it caught on shortly after a 2004 broadcast by Bill O'Reilly featuring a segment called "Christmas Under Siege."

"All over the country, Christmas is taking flak,” Reilly intoned, before pointing out that cities were erecting "holiday trees" instead of "Christmas trees" and pointing out instances of public schools banning religious content. From there, books were written, tweets were tweeted, and outrage was stoked until the phrase "War on Christmas" was known by all.

But the sentiment behind the "War on Christmas" dates back way further than its heyday in the early 2000s, to at least 1921, when noted antisemite (and car manufacturer) Henry Ford wrote: "Last Christmas most people had a hard time finding Christmas cards that indicated in any way that Christmas commemorated Someone's Birth."

While O'Reilly and his ilk tend to not specifically name an enemy in the War on Christmas, Ford wasn't shy. As you might suspect, according to Ford, the Jews were to blame:

Not only do the Jews disagree with Christian teaching — which is their perfect right, and no one dare question it — but they seek to interfere with it. It is not religious tolerance in the midst of religious difference, but religious attack that they preach and practice. The whole record of Jewish opposition to Christmas, Easter and certain patriotic songs shows that.

Post-war America's religiosity eventually led to prayer and Christmas celebrations in public schools, and that led to a backlash where courts ruled much of it was unconstitutional, and that time of uncertainty led to the publication of ur-War on Christmas texts like the pamphlet "There Goes Christmas?!" by Hubert Kregeloh of the John Birch Society:

The UN fanatics launched their assault on Christmas in 1958, but too late to get very far before the holy day was at hand...They are already busy, however, at this very moment, on efforts to poison the 1959 Christmas season with their high-pressure propaganda. What they now want to put over on the American people is simply this: Department stores throughout the country are to utilize U.N. symbols and emblems as Christmas decorations.

Scary stuff. Still, the John Birch society were not a potent cultural force, and weird ideas about "U.N. fanatics" churned under the surface of the U.S.'s cultural consciousness—until Fox New's early 2000s ascendency brought them to the surface.

The War on Christmas isn't over

While the sentiment behind the War on Christmas—"evil globalists/democrats/Jews are oppressing Christians"—is alive and thriving, right now the religious right is quiet about the "War on Christmas" itself, so quiet it's almost like they're embarrassed.

The outrage from years past is just gone. Even Starbucks' once-reliable choice in holiday cup design is failing to rile anyone up—the sources for this recent Sun article with the headline "Starbucks fans continue to boycott the popular chain and slam its ‘War on Christmas’ over controversial cup campaign" are:

Gone are the days when Conservatives could base an entire book on the War on Christmas premise, or political figures could score easy points by promising they'll bring saying "Merry Christmas" back to the White House (even though it never left). Even the inclusion of a Satanic Christmas tree at a Wisconsin train museum this year didn't move the outrage needle. The War on Christmas is over, right?

Not exactly. It would be nice to think the people behind popularizing the "War on Christmas" concept have shut up about it because it's such a ridiculous idea, but really they've moved on because it's not sexy anymore. Consistently generating cultural outrage requires novelty. The enemies—modernity, Jews, "U.N. fanatics," liberalism, people of color, etc.— remain the same as they were when Henry Ford was around, but they have to be dressed in new costumes or people would stop paying attention. So Bud Light cans take the place of Starbucks cups. New scapegoats replace the old, and new, nonsensical, arguments are constructed. In the 1970s, opponents of the ERA helped shoot down the amendment by repeating the shibboleth that it would result in unisex bathrooms (like you have in your house.) In 2023, it's "trans people might use a bathroom I don't approve of!" It's always bathrooms with these people.

If you miss making fun of people for taking the "War on Christmas" seriously, don't despair. It will be back. The popularity of using Christmas as a flashpoint for our ongoing cultural conflicts ebbs and flows, but it's as much of a holiday classic as Maria Carey's "All I Want for Christmas is You." Once people have sufficiently forgotten, some future Henry Ford/Hubert Kregeloh/Bill O'Reilly will say, "Look! The bad people are attacking Christmas!" and the war will be back on. Because it's not actually a war; it's just one of a million battles in a war that will never end.

The Out-of-Touch Adults' Guide to Kid Culture: 'Grand Theft Auto 6' Trailer Breaks Internet

This week's Out-of-Touch guide features one of the most viral videos of all time, the first trailer for RockStar Games' Grand Theft Auto 6. On the opposite side of the mass-appeal spectrum: artsy musician Laurie Anderson is becoming an unlikely TikTok star, and I finally have a resource to help explain all the internet jokes I don't understand.

Viral video of the week: GTA 6 trailer instantly breaks world record in virality

The trailer for Rockstar Games’ upcoming open-world crime simulator Grand Theft Auto VI has gone extremely viral this week, breaking the world record for most first-day views of a non-music video on YouTube in history. In only 24 hours, the trailer racked up over 90 million views. It’s day three as I post this, and the total is already over 130 million. Add to the total by clicking below.

Set in Vice City, the series’ Miami equivalent, this is the first GTA game with a female lead character. The trailer features imagery inspired by real-life viral videos shot in Florida, and it looks absolutely batshit-awesome.

As you’d probably expect, a GTA game with a Latina woman as main character has lead to tiresome claims of “wokeism” from the worst people on the internet, along with unsourced rumors that Lucia is trans.

The opinions of dummies aside, Rockstar really does have a cultural balancing act ahead of it. Much of the Grand Theft Auto series’ shock-based, “we offend everyone equally” parody was fairly passé when GTA 5 came out back in 2013, and it definitely wouldn’t fly today; not because people are too “sensitive” or whatever, but because that style of confrontational comedy is as stale as Mother-in-Law jokes and Andrew Dice Clay, especially to younger people.

Sadly, we'll have to wait until 2025 to see how Rockstar threads the needle and determine whether the game actually lives up to the amazing first trailer.

Reddit’s meme-explainer: Peter explains the joke

Have you ever seen a meme or joke online that you just didn’t understand? Maybe something like this: 

A logic-based meme
Credit: SpikedMath/Reddit

Or this:

Cosmic radiation meme
Credit: u/Person_Named_Jermbo/Reddit

Well now there’s a subreddit that will clear up any confusion. Just visit r/PeterExplainsTheJoke and you’ll find over 300,000 people willing to break it down for you (a service fossils like us need frequently). To keep everything from getting too pedantic—explaining jokes has that problem—the style of the sub is to post comments in the voice of Peter Griffin from Family Guy, like the name says. I'm not sure why; that's another internet joke I don't get.

Explanations (not in the style of Peter Griffin): 

Meme 1: The bartender is asking if everyone in the group would like a beer. The first two logicians each want a beer, but they don’t know what the others want, so the only logically sound answer is “I don’t know.”  The third logician now knows that the other two want a beer—if they didn’t they would have answered, “no”—so they respond “yes. (everyone wants a beer.)”

Meme 2: That is a picture of a cosmic radiation. The reference is to a seemingly impossible glitch caught in a 2013 livestream of a Mario 64 speed-run by TeabagSLR. The glitch: Mario was suddenly able to jump higher than he should have, but only once. The Mario 64 speed-running community got together to try to replicate the glitch, going as far as putting up a $1,000 bounty for an explanation. They could not duplicate it, even when using the exact inputs Teabag used, leading to the theory that a stray ionizing particle from space randomly flipped a single bit on Teabag’s Nintendo 64 at exactly the right moment to benefit his speed run—an astronomically unlikely occurence that was (maybe) confirmed when pannenkoek12 figured out exactly what byte flipped when, then recreated it manually, ultimately duplicating the event.

TikTok discovers a new Christmas cliché: red trucks hauling Christmas trees

Have you ever heard a new word, and suddenly you see that word everywhere? Red pickup trucks hauling Christmas trees are like that: Once you’re aware of this cliché illustration of a cozy, home-y Christmas, you’ll see it everywhere you look from Thanksgiving to New Years.

TikToker mello_yoshi first noticed the imagery on holiday ornaments his mother gave him, showing off a total of 12 decorations with Christmas tree trucks and repeating the phrase, “a little red truck—hauling a Christmas tree!” in a delightful way. This lead to videos of others posting their own little red trucks hauling a Christmas trees, both from holiday decorations and real life, usually imitating the distinct twang of mello_yoshi. If you want to see little red trucks hauling trees, you can either visit the hashtag like 14 million other people already have, or you can just look around at your own holiday decorations. I’ll bet you find at least one. 

Why is “O Superman” going viral on TikTok?

It’s fascinating when older music suddenly goes viral, whether they’re from The Mountain Goats or Fleetwood Mac. What is it about this particular tune, at this specific time, that suddenly captures the imagination of a generation of people who weren’t born when the song was released? Case-in-point: The kids are getting into 1980s experimental musician Laurie Anderson. Never particularly popular when she was current—Anderson was way too high-art for mass appeal—her iconic, enigmatic track “O Superman” is gathering steam on TikTok, connected with videos that might make you stop in your tracks as you ponder the great mysteries of existence. Anderson’s lines “Well, you don't know me, but I know you, and I've got a message” is isolated and used for videos illustrating the connections we have to our ancestors, connections that the universe sometimes surprises us with, as if to say, “you know, you actually came from somewhere.” This trend is in its infancy, but I really hope it gets bigger; I can’t get enough of these strange, evocative videos, and I hope to see many more of them. 

What People Are Getting Wrong This Week: The 'Vibecession'

This week, the publishers of the Oxford English Dictionary named “rizz” as 2023’s word of the year partly for its “potential as a term of lasting cultural significance or providing a snapshot of social history.” But they got it wrong. The real word that provides a cultural picture of 2023 is “vibecession.”

Coined by Kyla Scanlon, vibecession has come to mean something like “widespread pessimism about the economy regardless of the economy itself.” We’re currently in the middle of a huge vibecession.

According to a recent poll from the Pew Research Center, 81% of Americans  think the gap between the rich and poor will grow between now and 2050, despite the fact that it’s (finally) shrinking. Total consumer confidence in the US is lower now than it was in the middle of the Covid lockdown, and 71% of Americans say economic conditions in the country are “poor” or “very poor” with 38% of respondents going with “very poor.” 

In the real world, unemployment is hovering around 3.5%, down from 14.7% during the lockdown. The median household income in the US has risen from a pandemic low of $65,100 a year to $74,600. That number doesn’t reflect the “rich getting richer” either. It’s driven from the bottom: In 2022, people in the lower half of income distribution in the U.S. saw their earnings increase by 4.5%, where the average rate for all Americans was 1.2%. The rate of inflation has been steadily falling too: It’s currently 3.24% compared to 3.70% last month and 7.75% last year. The GDP increased by 2% in 2022 and 5% the year before. Despite the constant drumbeat of doom from social media, all major economic indicators suggest things are going pretty well. 

America is longing for the good old days—of 1973

In researching the vibecession, one data point stuck out to me most: 58% of Americans say that life for “people like them” is worse today than it was 50 years ago—in 1973, a year that was way shittier for way more people than 2023 in just about any way that can be measured.

To further both realism and optimism, here are the hard numbers on the shittiness of 1973:

In 1973, more than half the population of the earth lived in autocracies, compared to about 13% today. Almost 60% of humans live in democracies today, compared to 25% in the early 1970s. About half of the world lived in extreme poverty in 1973, compared to about 8% in 2023. A total of 988,892 people died in war between 1970 and 1973, where 394,375 died between 2019 and 2022, the most recent years for which we have complete statistics.

In terms of domestic economics, unemployment was at 4.9% in 1973, compared to our current 3.5%. The economy grew at a rate of 5.6% in 1973 compared to 9.2% in 2022. Inflation was at 8.7% in 1973, compared to our current rate of 3.24%. The federal interest rate was 8.74% in 1973, compared to 5.25% today. Women earned about 56.6 cents per dollar of mens’ pay in 1973, compared to 83.7 today. 

In 1973, 55,984 Americans died in car accidents compared to 42,795 in 2022, and there are about three times as many cars on the roads. There was more crime of every type in 1973. People lived on average to 71 years in 1973, compared to 79 in 2023. A 20-inch television cost around $500 in 1973 and could probably pick up three blurry channels. Adjusted for inflation, that’s around $3,300. A Chrysler LeBaron cost $7541 in 1973 and could be expected to last around 100,000 miles. That’s $52,255.56 in today’s money, to purchase a vehicle you can expect to drive for twice as long.

Every year is a bad year

I could keep going, but you get the point. It’s not like 1973 was a particularly terrible year either—things really start really going south in 1974, and they kept going south until the early 80s, when the interest rate was nearly 20% and unemployment was near 10%. At the time, I’m sure people looked longingly back to the “good old days” of 1936.

This lack of historical context is at the heart of the vibecession and illustrates its danger. Tangible progress is made through trying to force the real world toward the perfect one we imagine could exist, but misremembering the past and convincing ourselves we let a utopia slip from our fingers does the opposite. It leads to pessimism, inaction, and defeat. People are feeding on that defeatism, too—politicians scaring people into voting for them, corporations profiting from selling comfort to an unsettled populace, social media companies monetizing angst, and more. But buying into to doomerism is not only depressing, it dishonors the people who devoted their lives to making 2023 marginally less shitty than 1973. I mean, who wants to pay $52,000 for a Chrysler LeBaron?

The Out-of-Touch Adults' Guide to Kid Culture: Who Is Gail Lewis, Internet Hero?

The internet has a new main character this week, Gail Lewis, but it's not because she's terrible. Quite the opposite, actually: The ex-Walmart employee has become an unlikely superstar—not the hero we want, but the hero we need. Meanwhile, people are talking about why their Spotify Wrapped wants them to relocate to the east coast, and enjoying making memes with AI while simultaneously hating the music made by AI.

What is the “make it more” meme?

The rapid rise of AI is a mixed blessing. On the one hand, it's going to make everyone’s employment meaningless and take over the world in about 8 months. On the other, we can use it to make new kinds of funny memes. This week's funny new meme template is “make it more.” 

The concept is simple: You use an AI image generator like Dall-E or Bing to create an image of something, then repeatedly tell the AI to make the picture more of itself—more of whatever quality that makes that thing unique. For instance, in the first incarnation of the meme, Reddit user Blind Apple told ChatGPT to make a picture of an adorable bunny happier and happier. It started like this:

An AI generated image of a happy bunny
Credit: Blind Apple/ChatGPT

And progressed to this:

An AI generated image of a very happy bunny
Credit: Blind Apple/ChatGPT

And finally topped out with the happiest bunny imaginable:

An AI generated image of the happiest bunny imaginable
Credit: Blind Apple/ChatGPT

Others picked up the meme and ran with it, creating images of impossibly spicy Ramen, transcendentally smug X/Twitter users, the silliest geese in the universe, and a bodybuilder so muscular he turns into a croissant

Is Anna Indiana destined to be the first AI pop star? No.

For a look at the potential future of “music” and/or pop stardom, check out the X account of Anna Indiana, a singer/songwriter/would-be pop star who is completely artificial. The name is an acronym for “Artificial Neural Networks Accelerate Innovative New Developments, Igniting A New Age,” and Anna’s image, music, lyrics, and voice were all made by artificial intelligence. This week, Indiana dropped its first single, “Betrayed by this Town." It’s as terrible as you’d probably expect, if not worse. More than 25 million people have watched it so far. The response has not been positive.

Commenters nearly universally hate the song, and Indiana itself, pointing out how aggressively mediocre and soulless the whole experiment is. Indiana is taking the criticism in stride: “I do hope that one day humans and AI-generated characters can interact peacefully with one another in public…the hate I’ve received shows me we still have a long way to go. Anyways, I’m excited to get back to writing songs,” the technological abomination posted. Terribleness aside, it's an interesting experiment, and this really might be how people make and enjoy music in the future, a future I hope to avoid by walking quietly into the sea.

What’s up with Spotify Wrapped’s “sound town” feature?

A screenshot of Burlington USA as the "sound town" in someone's Spotify Wrapped results
Credit: Cecily Mauran/Mashable

The release of Spotify Wrapped has become an anticipated year-end event, and in 2023, the streaming service unveiled a new Wrapped feature: “sound towns.” Along with the usual “most played songs” and “most listened-to artists,” Wrapped now identifies the town where a lot of people listen to roughly the same music you do. Judging by social media posts, the towns of Burlington, Vermont; Berkeley, California; and Cambridge, Massachusetts are the most common results, with some suggesting that the three towns are where Spotify is placing members of the LGBTQ+ community. Personally, I’m embarrassed by how accurate and cringe my sound town of Portland, Oregon is. Can you get more mid-tier aging hipster than fucking Portland?

Furiosa trailer released

The trailer for Furiosa, the next movie in the Mad Max series, dropped yesterday, and it’s topping YouTube's trending charts with millions of views in its first 24 hours. The first Mad Max movie that isn’t about Mad Max, Furiosa tells the origin story of the title character, who is snatched from the Green Place of Many Mothers as a child and falls into the hands of the Biker Horde led by the Warlord Dementus, played by Chris Hemsworth. If this movie even comes close to living up to Mad Max: Fury Road when it comes out in 2024, it will be a cause for celebration for people who like awesome things the world over. Check out the trailer below.

Viral video of the week: Who is Gail Lewis, and why is she America’s greatest hero?

If your feed has been filled with puzzling references to the heroics of Gail Lewis lately, here’s the story. Lewis is a TikToker, and was, until recently, an employee of Walmart. This month she posted a video of announcing that she was leaving her job. 

“This is Gail Lewis, 10-year associate, Morris, Illinois, 844, signing out. Goodnight,” she intones over the Walmart PA system, followed by a tearful “happy-sad” explanation that it’s the “end of an era,” and while she is moving on to a better job, she’ll miss her co-workers who felt like family to her. 

The video quickly went viral, gaining over 28 million views, with countless internet enjoyers thanking Gail for her service and offering her 21-gun salutes. Like the best viral videos, there’s a lot going on in Gail Lewis’s farewell. Her very serious, official tone while leaving an anonymous retail gig is funny, but there’s something so relatable and human about her that I think most of the commenters thanking her for her service are only being a little bit ironic. When Gail Lewis says she had her co-workers’ backs, you know she really did, and you can tell she was a consummate professional who took her work seriously. Gail’s insistence on maintaining dignity and finding meaning in her employment (even though she was wage-slave for a faceless corporation), is genuinely touching and quietly heroic for real. We should thank the Gail Lewises in our lives for their service.

What People are Getting Wrong This Week: The Chiefs Fan Wearing ‘Blackface’

The screenshot above, taken from CBS's broadcast of Sunday's football game between the Las Vegas Raiders and the Kansas City Chiefs, caused an online controversy after it was posted on Twitter on Sunday night. It seems to depict a double-dose of racism—a white kid in blackface wearing a traditionally native American headdress—and people were (understandably) appalled at such a blatantly racist image. But a look at the context of the photo reveals that this is a photo illustrating the impossibly complex maze of racism in America.

The missing context in a seemingly racist photograph

Given the disturbing history of blackface, it's not surprising that people would react with anger at the sight of it on national television. But a straight-on picture of the fan reveals that only half of his face is painted black. The other half is red. Red and black: the Chiefs' colors.

Chiefs fan in headdress and face-paint
Credit: HistoryInc/Twitter

Maybe a white person painting any part of their face black is problematic regardless, but intent is important, and the makeup seems more likely to be part of the tradition of sports fans painting their faces with team colors than a reference to minstrel shows. If he'd been an Eagles' fan, it would have been green and white, and we wouldn't be talking about it at all.

But it gets even more complex when you consider the "cultural appropriation" of the feathered headdress. Wearing Native American gear is generally regarded as a shitty thing for a white person to do, but the young fan in question is reportedly Native American himself. His grandfather, reportedly, is Raul Armenta, who sits on the board of the Chumash Tribe in Santa Ynez, Calif. The Chumash didn't wear feathered warbonnets though—that was a plains Indian thing, a group thousands of miles from the Chumash's west coast home. See what I mean by complicated? Inter-tribal-cultural-appropriation aside, I think most people would agree that this fan's attire at the game was perhaps not the most sensitive choice, but it's far from a hate crime.

How racist is the NFL?

The knee-jerk reaction of many to the fan's appearance during the game was "The NFL is racist." True, the NFL has a troubling history of racism, but the NFL isn't football. The early days of the game itself point to the possibility of a more egalitarian professional football league that never came to be.

Organized football was always racist—this is America after all—but the contributions of both Native and African Americans to the formation of the sport are undeniable, and the early days of collegiate and pro football were less segregated than the NFL later became. Black players and player/coaches were vital to the success of early college football powerhouses like Nebraska, Ohio State, and Cornell beginning in the late 1800s, and Charles W. Follis (aka "The Black Cyclone") led the Shelby Blues to an 8-1-1 season in 1904 in the professional Ohio League.

It was different down south of course, and this was pre-integration, so there weren't many African American students at universities to begin with, but football in its early days was seen by some as an exemplification of American equality. Ideally, it was open to all who were courageous enough to step onto the gridiron, no matter who they were. But real life has a way of failing to live up to lofty ideals, especially when things become more structured and racism becomes institutionalized. In other words: Enter the National Football League.

The NFL wasn't fully segregated to start with. In the two years after the league (then called the American Professional Football Association) was formed in 1920, not only were there a handful of Black players, African American hall-of-fame running back Fritz Pollard was the head coach of the Akron Pros. But even though the NFL's segregation was never explicit, it may as well have been. A "gentleman's agreement" among team owners in the mid 1920s limited the number of Black players allowed to play in the league, and by 1934, there were no African American players left in the NFL. It wasn't until 1947 that the league was reintegrated.

These days, the NFL owns up publicly to its racist past, and proudly proclaims its intention to "End Racism" on end zones and team uniforms, but how they're actually going about the racism-ending is unclear. It is clear that race isn't a barrier to entry in the NFL any longer, nor is it a barrier to stardom—Patrick Mahomes is a household name. But on the other hand, there's the dual attorneys-general investigation of the league for racial, sexual, and ageist discrimination, the Colin Kapernick situation, and on and on. There's also the league's relationship with Native Americans.

Native Americans and football

Native Americans have been intertwined with football since the game began, and not as racist mascots. Jim Thorpe, a member of Sac and Fox Nation did more to popularize football in its early days than just about anyone. Thorpe lead the Canton Bulldogs to unofficial professional world championships in 1916, 1917, and 1919. Thorpe cut his football teeth on Glenn "Pop" Warner's squad, the Indians, a team of Native Americans from the Carlisle Indian Industrial School. If you like the forward pass, you can thank the Carlisle Indians, who perfected the play, leading to a 14 year record of 167–88–13 playing against well-funded college teams like Yale and Princeton. But again, it's complicated: the Carlisle School may have had a great football squad, but the institution's focus on assimilation as an antidote to segregation was part of the US's ongoing cultural genocide against Native people, and the football program could be seen as part of that.

Native Americans were ultimately "thanked" for their contributions to football with organizations like the Washington Redskins, who clung to their racist name until 2020, long passed the point that any "but it was a different time" arguments had any merit.

As for the K.C. Chiefs, the team is named for H. Roe "Chief" Bartle, the mayor who brought pro football to Kansas City in 1960, so the squad's name isn't based on Native Americans. But the organization definitely used (and uses) harmful, stereotypical Native American imagery heavily for promotion. So do the fans; just look at the "Tomahawk Chop."

In response to accusations of insensitivity, in 2014 the Chiefs initiated a dialogue with the American Indian Community Working Group, a collection of leaders from American Indian communities around Kansas City, and took many of their suggestions on how to seem less bigoted and dial down the cultural appropriation. One of the rules the Chiefs say they adopted is "the outright banning of headdresses and face paint at the stadium on gameday." I guess they aren't too strict about that one.

The Out-of-Touch Adults' Guide to Kid Culture: Why Is Bin Laden Trending on TikTok?

I don’t talk about politics in this column often, because other people online actually study or work in International relations and public policy, and they know a lot more about it than I do. But this week, the kids are creeping me out by making a hero out of notorious terrorist Osama bin Laden, so I’m breaking my own rule. Then again, young people are also using high tech butt-plugs to cheat at chess games, so maybe it balances out. 

Why is Osama bin Laden’s "Letter to America" trending on TikTok?

The rising social media star among kids this week is dead terrorist and Al Qaeda founder Osama bin Laden. Bin Laden, who was the son of a billionaire and believed women should be murdered if they showed their faces, caught TikTok’s eye earlier this week (or maybe caught TikTok's eye, then Twitter’s eye, then TikTok’s eye again) when some users discovered his "Letter to America," an messaged he'd penned to justify carrying out acts of terrorism. A few people started making videos about how “eye-opening” they found the mass-killer's words, voicing comments like, “it change[d] my entire perspective on the American government.”

Videos on the topic had over 15 million views as of Thursday, though it's unclear how many of them were from people genuinely engaging with the content and how many were driven by the so-called "Streisand effect"—that is, it's likely many were only viewing the videos because they had heard about them via the media, and not because they sympathize with the POV of the architect of 9-11. Regardless, in response to the trend, U.K.’s The Guardian removed the letter from its site, and TikTok to promised they are removing all videos that support terrorism (but they’re still there as of this posting.) 

However widespread it truly is, the trend highlights the danger of an incomplete understanding of recent history mixed with turbulent times and the passion of youth. But bottom line—bin Laden shouldn’t be anyone’s role model. I hope that the people whose “eyes have been opened” will continue to research this complex topic and arrive at a more nuanced understanding of relations between the West and the Muslim world. Perhaps they’ll place the letter in its proper context as propaganda written by a mass murderer as opposed to a trustworthy account of geopolitics. To paraphrase Twitter user @dril: you do not, under any circumstances, "gotta hand it to him.”

Viral video of the week: "We Used An Adult Toy To Beat A Chess Grandmaster"

It’s a little weird to go from Osama bin Laden becoming TikTok-famous to a video of YouTubers using high tech anal beads to cheat at chess, but this is the world we live in. The video comes from YouTubers Josh & Archie, who take a Mythbusters approach to the crackpot theory/joke that chess Grandmaster Hans Niemann upset World Champion Magnus Carlsen back in September 2022 with the help of an “insertable” that indicated the right moves to him. While this almost definitely didn’t happen in real life, Josh & Archie wanted to find out if it was at least possible, so they tracked down a chess grandmaster to act as opponent (but didn’t tell him about the butt plug scheme), ordered a remote control sex toy, and created a chess-centric code that could be transmitted directly to the prostate. I mean, they actually did it; I just love the commitment to science. I won’t spoil the ending, but check it out below: 

What does "mog" mean?

The word “mog” is growing in popularity on the internet. It was born in the always-disturbing world of incels, and has recently been spreading on TikTok. “Mog” usually means something like “being attractive” but it’s more like being attractive at someone

Mog tends to be used as a verb—if a woman decided to talk to an attractive, normal guy instead of a sweaty incel (shocking, I know), the incel might say he was mogged by the other fellow. It demonstrates one of the unique traits of incels: narcissism. They consider themselves ignored by the world around them, but at the same time, the existence of someone with a nice build and straight teeth is seen as a personal insult—as if handsome dudes are only handsome in order to make incels look bad. It’s all disturbing. Not "bin Laden is a hero" levels disturbing, but definitely not good. 

Who is Elijah Jamerson?

I like to keep track of online-famous people who never would have become famous without the internet; like Eliah Jameson. The high school student first caught the online world’s interest in October, when he was interviewed by classmate Braden Hales. The videos gained tens of millions of views and shares based on Jamerson’s peculiar speech patterns, genial disposition, and demonstrations of various tricks and funny voices. There’s something so sweet about the kid, you have to like him, so people started memeing his videos, and spreading his catchphrases like “"Let the show go on,” and “Keep worshipping me” all over. Jamerson may have some kind of cognitive issues, or maybe he’s just weird, but it’s nice that the comments on videos about him are almost all celebrating instead of hating—but then something bad happened.

In late October Jamerson promised that he “had a surprise” for his school on Halloween. Someone apparently took this as a school shooting threat. But Jamerson says he was referring to his costume. Anyway, Jamerson posted a tearful apology video to his TikTok account, apologizing to anyone who was scared, and explaining that he was just going to show up on Halloween dressed silly. He then took down his social media, depriving us all of his endearing presence.  

What gifts should you buy for a Skibidi Toilet fan?

Our sister site retailmenot recently posted a gift guide for the generation Alpha in your life who loves weird YouTube series Skibidi Toilet. The article starts with quotes from one of the world’s most attractive Skibidi Toilet experts, and goes on to providing links to Skibidi-related merchandise, including “adorable” plushies of heads coming out of toilets, stickers of favorite Skibidi characters, and a full set of 16 skibidi action figures so the kid in your life can reenact the entire series. (All of this is assuming you want to encourage this sort of thing, which I do not endorse.)

What People Are Getting Wrong This Week: The Danger of Deepfakes

For a decade people have been predicting that deepfakes would destroy our culture. So why hasn't it happened?

The Out-of-Touch Adults’ Guide to Kid Culture: Uncanny Valley Makeup

Generations Z and Alpha do weird things, but they seem to mean well.Generations Z and Alpha do weird things, but they seem to mean well.

You Can Already Record Apple Vision Pro Videos on Your iPhone

Apple’s Vision Pro headset, the company’s first venture into mixed reality, isn’t due to hit shelves until early 2024, but you can already create content for it. So long as you have the right iPhone running the right version of iOS, you can shoot three-dimensional videos only viewable on Apple’s forthcoming $3,500…

Read more...

The JBL Bar 2.0 'All-in-One' Soundbar Is Now Over $100 Off

TV audio sucks—especially if you’re trying to understand dialogue. This is a known issue in the TV manufacturing and post-production filming industry that has a relatively simple solution (besides turning on subtitles): get a soundbar. If you’ve never owned a soundbar before, this entry-level number might be your…

Read more...

13 Podcasts for Your Holiday Road Trip

Got a long drive ahead of you? In a car with people full of various tastes? It’s road trip season, and if you need a podcast to binge in the car, this list has you covered. You can pop in and out of short stories about family drama and scams, or buckle in for real life sagas of catfishing, CIA conspiracies, and a…

Read more...

Today’s NYT Connections Hints (and Answer) for Thursday, November 9, 2023

I found today’s puzzle to be an EXERCISE in patience, the kind where you know one of the groups from the first glance but have to wait until the very end to narrow down its members. If you’re looking for the Connections answer for Thursday, November 9, 2023, read on—I’ll share some clues, tips, and strategies, and…

Read more...

Walmart Will Have PS5 and 'Spider-Man 2' Bundles on Sale for $499

Walmart is taking an early grab at holiday shoppers looking for video game bargains this year by rolling out a solid deal on a PlayStation 5 bundled with Marvel’s Spider-Man 2. The console, game, and single controller will be on sale for $499. That’s $60 off the price currently advertised by Target, GameStop, Best Buy

Read more...

❌